wysperwolf
Posted : 7/19/2007 4:38:08 PM
it does not sound particuarly true. It is kind of like saying a dog might run into something so lets cut off thier legs. Unless it is a common problem then it sounds more like an excuse. Educate me if I am wrong!
That's almost like saying all dogs are the same.
no im not being snooty =]
Just to say, Not all breeds are built the same. Some dogs do have rather thin tails.
like greyhound for exm. grey hounds have long lean skinny bodies and legs, to help them run super fast. It does a grey hound no good to feed it so much that it looks filled and up to a weight some one wants it to look, only because they are born slender and have a thin figure.
German shepherds hard lean, broad shoulders, but huskies on the other hand, have more narrow shoulders.
A huskies tail is thiker in tail size than a greyhound as grey hound need a thinner tail for balance of their bodies.
-shrugs- maybe im terribly wrong.
Ripley has rear dew claws, Frosty does not. I always assumed the breeder removed Frosty's, but maybe he never had them??
Wow, Ive never come across a dog with rears.. Ive seen lots of new born pups, maybe i just never noticed them....I must see a pic of a dogs hind foot that has dew claws! wow you learn something new every day
]