Chuffy
Posted : 2/16/2009 6:20:49 PM
denise m
I totally agree that women should be able to BF in public without discrimination but I also think it is incumbent on mothers to be somewhat sensitive to the public around her.
Why?
Not being picky, a genuine question.
It's a well known fact you can't please everyone. If you latch the baby on quickly, quietly and calmly, there may still be someone who caught a flash of nipple and wished you'd used a blanket. If you use a blanket, there is very likely still going to be someone who thinks you should sit in the corner and face the wall. Some might prefer you leave the room altogether, or might vehemently believe you should have stayed at home to do that sort of thing. It seems rather silly to place so much responsibility of the shoulders of the mother, who can have NO IDEA what values those around her hold and which ones to cater for!
I am considerate of other patrons when I am out. If William is screaming and making a racket, I find a way to get him quiet fast, or I get him out of there. Now, if another woman has a hungry baby and she is farting around looking for somewhere quiet to sit and get her blanket out while the kid screams, I would think she was highly inconsiderate. Get over yourself woman, and stick a boob in that kid's mouth, so we don't have to listen to that god-awful noise! 
A cousin recently had a baby. It's so sad how hung up she is about breastfeeding - at least as bad as I was. The baby is PLAINLY hungry - not crying yet, but definitely hungry. Instead of simply acting on the hunger sign and feeding, she fannies around, puts it off, anounces she is going to another room, debates whether just to take him home and do it there... and all the while he's getting hungrier and eventually he is crying and then screaming the place down. Way to CREATE a fussy baby! The BEAUTY of breastfeeding is that it is, literally, fast food! There's nothing to sterilise, mix, warm up or cool down. I want to say to her: "you can be feeding the baby in less time than it takes to explain the fact that he needs it - so just do it!" but I can't because I was exactly the same!
denise m
As for older babies, by the time your child is 2 or 3 I don't really see the need for public breast feeding. At that age their thirst or hunger can be satisfied in other ways. Leave the suckling for more intimate and bonding time. JMO
I would also attempt to keep breastfeeding of older babies at home if possible, but the trouble is, they get to an age where they can SAY "ba bas" or "milk!" or what have you. I'm guessing I would rather just feed the kiddo what they want - hey, there is nothing healthier! - than have strangers turn and stare because I got a toddler tantruming and screaming for "BOOBOOS!" Breastmilk isn't JUST food and drink. It is much, much more than that. I see 3-4yo kids with dummies, because young children have a need to suckle - even if they are not hungry or thirsty. Having thought about it, I would MUCH rather see a kid suckling on a breast at that age, if s/he NEEDED to suckle, rather than on an artificial nipple which ruins the mouth and let's face, it just looks nasty. (Mind you, I have an aversion to plastic, so I am biased in that regard.)