AuroraLove
Posted : 9/19/2008 1:30:21 PM
Pit_Pointer_Aussie
Bones was going to adopt the dog since he wasn't inherently dangerous, but rather that he'd been commanded to attack.
Not the most realistic, but for a mainstream show, I felt like it was pretty good. More than we usually get!
What do you mean "inherently" dangerous?
I assumed they used the Shepherd as the attacker because they are more apt to attack on command versus being pitted in a ring.
I'm not asking in a confrontational way but just curious.
I was very pleased with the show despite some innacurracies, I think it showed the general public that a dog used for ill purposes is still capable of love and rehabilitation.
I think it seemed fairly realistic except it sure did take a few pages out of the Micheal Vick case, like when the guy said "I dont know what goes on, I just rent the barn out", LOL OK buddy.
I cried to, whomever wrote the episode is definitely a dog lover and are as tired of the stereotypes as we are.
I've seen pitties getting a lot of good press lately. Now if only more people would get involved instead of turning a blind eye. I dont expect non pit-bull people to take a stand but it would be more realistic if we could hold irresponsible dog owners at fault and put more pressure on dog owners to do the right thing.....whatever the breed