calliecritturs
Posted : 5/7/2008 7:31:54 PM
I'm going to take the devil's advocate position here. The problem is you only know one 'side' here and neither well. It is made to SOUND like the big bad driver is taking advantage of the bereaved owners ... but wait a minute here -- you don't know anything really about this.
1. This dog was apparently a KNOWN runner -- so why the heck didn't someone LEASH HIM before they opened the door? I have one -- I never *EVER* not even one time open the *front* door with Luna loose. Her training has now progressed and she's not the runner she was, but flatly even tho she was a mega 'bolter' -- she never EVER got away because we don't allow it to happen!
2. I'd have to wonder how often this dog bolted ... was the driver local or was maybe told that this dog often slipped out of the door? There are some people who just helplessly wring their hands and say 'Ohh dear, got away AGAIN!' -- when you live on a fast road you, the homeowner/dogowner have to take ALL the necessary precautions.
3. The driver also claims to be a dog owner -- but it sounds to me like he's trying to teach a lesson, which leads me to wonder if there isn't more to the story somehow. Like a serial escape artist that the whole neighborhood just KNOWS is gonna "get it" someday.
Unfortunately, going to small claims court is costly -- everyone misses work, and it winds up nasty most of the time.
But we see over and over on here posts so many of us have made out of pure frustration because we all know those neighbors who just don't contain their animals ... some don't bother at all, others bother only when it's easy.
It's HARD to make sure that every time someone opens a door that the dog is contained. It takes time. It's inconvenient. It's aggravating.
But it's also necessary.
it's likely going to be deemed frivolous -- and it's possible it was done merely to prove a point. That's not the purpose of the law ... and I doubt anyone will learn much.