HoundMusic
Posted : 4/25/2008 2:43:04 PM
It is not the breed, it is the people
That's what I say...I don't believe any dog should have a 3 bite rule either, especially since after the first bite I'm sure the owners won't do much to help change the dogs issues and the dog will just go out and do it again.
What about people who raise their dogs right, train them, never encourage aggression, and ensure the dogis socialized. Then when the dog is 5, 6, 7+ years old and has been reliabe it's entire life, never given the owner a problem, suddenly "turns" on another person? I have seen it happen many, many times. Friend of mine had a docile, sweet 8 year old male pit. He had been around other dogs, people. Was actually a very nice dog. One night, the owner was walking the dog across the street from my apartment, on a summer night, so I was out on the stoop with a few other residents of that building. The dog quite suddenly lunged & attacked an elderly woman passing by. She lived across the hall from me, and her son owned a pit bull, so I doubt she was afraid of the dog - but is always a possibility. It was a pretty bad attack and the owner lost control of her dog while it was occurring. It took two men and the owner of the dog to beat this dog off the poor woman. THIS WAS A DOG WHO WAS LOVED, WELL TREATED, PROFESSIONALLY TRAINED. I could go on, with probably half a dozen more attacks under similar circumstances. I don't blame the dog/breed when they are owned by thugs. Although you do have to consider that the majority of these dogs are BRED by thugs. People are going to the shelter to get one, raise it right, and have no idea of it's breeding. It's owner could have been just an irresponsible BYB or a thug breeding dogs for fight or guarding.
I'm curious if anyone denies that these dogs are still, to this day, being bred for illegal or unsavory purposes? NOT trying to be devil's advocate, just genuinely curious if you discount that genetic factor and choose to only blame the dog's behavior 100% on how it was raised? IMHO, nature will override nurture 9 times out of 10.
Like I said, I'm not for BSL in any way, shape or form. But doesn't anyone believe that the breed is inherently aggressive? How can anyone say that it's not the breed? Doesn't that imply that there is no real difference in temperament between a pit bull and most other dogs? That seems to be a very dangerous mindset, to me.