kelliope
Posted : 3/26/2008 11:51:20 AM
mudpuppy
they have dozens of leashed-dogs areas they can go to
And that is exactly what I'd calmly tell her. That the area is DESIGNATED for OFF-LEASH dogs. Then I'd tell her that there are many leash required areas she could take her dog to if she'd like, but you'd appreciate her not spoiling the off-leash areas for those that are using it as it was intended.
However, please bear in mind that the exact same thing happens in reverse far more often. People go to leash only areas only to have their dog rushed by an out of control off leash dog with an idiot owner who thinks the rules don't apply to them.
Use the areas as they were designated to be used. Then no one should have a problem.
Sorry denise m, but that argument doesn't really work - the dog with the neck problem? The owner could easily tie a string to the dog if it remained in heel. Then technically the dog would be "leashed". And the guy who lets his dog walk the block by itself? Well, there are many people who don't appreciate someone's dog crapping in their front yard. The guy and his dog are lucky he doesn't have a vengeful neighbor.
Bottom line is that I'm sure most dog owners do not really have a problem with unleashed dogs within their owners control. I know I really don't. But as I said before, it's the people thumbing their nose at the rules or those that THINK their dog is within their control, when in fact the dog is rude and totally out of control, that are ruining it for the rest of us who are courteous and try to get along with society.
But now that I've posted, I'm sure the whole thread will turn around into how I'm wrong and unleashed and disregard for the rules is the way to go.