dgriego
Posted : 3/10/2008 3:11:00 PM
timsdat
Tell me are we going to going to turn this into another cheap shot thread at the Catholic religion or really discuss that they meant about the sins that they were talking about. What was stated in the article from the Vatican has been part of the teachings for years, not some new fangled concept just updated to todays world.
As the Op it was not my intention to take cheap shots at Catholics or the church although I will confess that I did find the name of the topic interesting and the sins listed as not well defined and open to a lot of interpetation. I found the new list to be rather silly.
Everyone pollutes the earth, even the greenest amoung us pollute the earth so what level of pollution is acceptable? If I recyle cans and plastic bottles but not glass is that sin? If I recycle and never litter and ride a bike to work but I consume electicity above all my neighbors is that sin? How does one define what is okay and what is sending me to hell (as the news article says)?
As for wealth there are many that have a lot of it and do a lot with it. Gates is one who comes to mind, he donates a ton of money to charity and is even leaving the bulk of his wealth to charity but he is for sure "obscenely wealthy". And if you compare him with someone who makes 50k a year who is selfish and never gives anything to anyone and hoards all for themselves, scoffs at the poor and makes rude comments to homeless people which one is the worst?