As many of you know, I am a trainer at our local Petco. I have to follow strict lesson plans, and I am supposed to follow how they recommend training exactly. but, it doesn't work for all dogs, so I tend to throw in a few of my own things as well. I always prefer to use positive reinforcement as a training method. Right now, I am using clicker training for Colton, and he LOVES it. I am reading The Power of Positive Dog Training and it really is good. But, what I'm not understanding is this...it seems like I should never tell the dog no, but completely ignore any bad behavior. When I'm training sit, I train the dog to sit and stay at the same time. They should hold the sit (or down, stay, whatever) until they are released. So, when teaching sit, we do the command first, then release them right away. When they understand that, we gradually make it a little longer. One second, two seconds...just a tiny bit at a time. I always tell my students to only hold it as long as you KNOW the dog can hold it for. Release the dog before he gets the chance to get up. But, occassionally, a dog gets up. My method of correcting this is to tell the dog "no...sit." and have him sit again. After a correction like that, I usually just make him sit for a second before releasing so that he knows that he can get up when released. Then of course, lots of praise. It is not an aggressive "no," but a firm "no." Does that go completely against Positive training methods?
Whatever method I'm using, I make sure to always have WAY more positive than negative. I try to avoid any "nos" if possible by only having the dog do what I am sure they can at that level before moving on. Yes, I have used pinch collars, and I feel they work for some dogs. Just as I feel head collars work for some dogs. It really depends on the dog. With the pinch, I never use it to give corrections, but instead let it be self correcting, and I make sure I use lots of praise when the dog does what he is supposed to. Does using a training device void the term positive training?