ORIGINAL: corvus
I recently learnt that in Peru, the common thing to do is keep some guinnea pigs and rabbits in the kitchen, feed them grass and vegies, then when you need some meat for a stew, catch a guinnea pig and snap its neck. I thought that was a very harmonious way of eating meat, actually. I think it's far better to be an intimate part of an animal's life BEFORE you eat it than to never know it as anything more than a piece of steak on a plate. I appreciate my beef a lot more these days, now that I've made lots of bovine friends, some of which I've eaten. Call me barbaric for eating something with a name, but I kinda feel that where civilisation went so wrong was in allowing people to divorce themselves from the messy problem of being a creature with a conscience that eats other creatures on a regular basis. Maybe if everyone was forced to know their food on a person level and appreciate the sacrifice made for them, our entire globe wouldn't be in the serious environmental state it's in now. Maybe people would care about what was happening.
I agree completely. Hence, my chickens. All of them have names, all of them are my friends until "the day" comes. [

] It really does make me feel MUCH better about my choice to continue eating meat. Now, when I see people who have never in their lives come into contact with any livestock, the kind of people who say things like "roosters don't lay eggs?" The kind of people who are just so completely removed from everything around them...it makes me physically ill. Humans are a part of nature, humans ARE animals. It makes me so sad that people forget this, and even sadder that we consider it a GOOD thing- "progress"- to move even further from a natural state.
My dream is to live out in the sticks, with my animals, and seperate myself totally from this society. I want to get back to a natural way of living in which I am *part* of nature, not running around destroying it and/or acting like it's mine to do with as I please. To me, most native peoples had it right, before Europeans came along to tell them how "savage" and wrong they were. (Savage, right...the Mayans had a working calendar when Europeans were still swinging from trees. [8|]) I want to live like they lived. It'll be hard to go without modern conveniences and technology, and I don't know if ultimately I would be able to give everything up...but right now, that is my goal. I no longer want to take part in a society that views other species, and the earth in general, as property and lesser beings to destroy and manipulate as they see fit.
When I asked myself that question, logic would take me down the path of "well, dogs and cats are intelligent and seem to have some consciousness, while cows don't...." but is that true, and how do we know? I think somewhere you're forced to draw a line and that line is kind of arbitrary when you get down to it. There is no hard and fast boundary between "intelligent" and "dumb" animals, especially the more these animals are studied for signs of consciousness, emotion, internal mental lives, etc. I also felt that I was choosing to eat meat basically because I wanted to and I could but ethically it felt a little... problematic.
Thing is, science doesn't have a real way to prove conciousness...even in humans. I could go into a long explanation of conciousness and why everything in the world has it, but that would involve a religion discussion so I won't. Just suffice to say, *everything* is intelligent and concious. Everything. The tests we use to define conciousness define it in HUMAN terms- when in fact, other species are so vastly different from humans (and from each other) that it really just doesn't translate well. Animals have a language of thought. They experience everything in the form of pictures, emotions, and senses, all mashed together. In communicating with animals telepathically, you will find that they have so many concepts that we just cannot understand. We don't have those concepts anymore...because we use language as a crutch. The form of communication, and experience, that animals use is much older and much more complex than language. They can't rely on a word to symbolize what they mean...and in fact, a word can't even begin to portray a thing for what it really is, so you really have to question which is "better." Personally, I would choose their way of thinking and communicating over our own. Their concept of a christmas tree could be a vivid picture of pine needles, a burst of green, a swirl of lights, the scent of pine, the feeling of the bark of the trunk on their wet nose. All of that means "christmas tree" to them. All we have, as humans, are the words "christmas tree." Which is "better?" Why?
It just makes me so upset when I hear "well, this animal is more intelligent than this one." or "Well, this animal has conciousness. This one doesn't." To me, those are the two most insanely presumptuous statements that anyone can possibly make. How on earth does one being have the right to say to another "You don't have a soul. You don't think. You aren't even aware of what you do. I don't understand you, and you don't do things in a way that I recognize, so you must not do them at all." Animals have minds that are just as good as ours. They experience the world just as we do (actually, they experience the world much more acutely than we do...so again, who is "better" in that aspect?) I personally believe that everything, not just humans, have souls and that all souls are equal.
I guess my point is just that the idea that some animals are concious and intelligent and others are not is all based on reasons made up by people who want to justify the cruel treatment of other living things. If science admits that animals think and feel as much as a human, where does that place animal experimentation on a morality scale? Why on earth would they put their profession in jeapordy to prove that animals do, in fact, feel mental anguish when they're hurt? The truth is, science

roves" what it wants to when it wants to. Scientists say that animals can't tell us what, or if, they think and so we have to assume that they can't. By that token, do we also have to assume that someone who is mute does not have a mind? Just something to think about.
And all of this isn't to say that we should never eat meat. Animals understand the predator/prey relationship. When a rabbit is killed by a wolf, it certainly isn't happy about it, but it understands that a wolf just needs to eat. Likewise, the wolf doesn't think that the rabbit is stupid, or "deserved" to get eaten...it actually has respect for the rabbit and gives thanks that it gave its life so that he may live. Yes, animals have abstract thoughts, an understanding of souls and an afterlife, and they certainly do give thanks for the lives that they take. They don't feel bad about it...they're just doing what their species does and they don't have any guilt. To be honest, that's all prey animals want from humans- a little bit of respect. They want to be treated like living things, not meat or milk or egg machines, and when they die they want us to give thanks for their lives- not act like we had a "right" to do what we want with a "mindless" animal. At least, this is what I've heard from animals themselves. [

]
Other animals honestly think humans are just broken. They really do seem to pity us. They just can't even begin to fathom why we have strayed so far.
Anyway, sorry I got so preachy...that just sent me off on a tirade. [

] I'll get off of my soapbox now. Jones, I'm really glad you started really thinking about things and decided to make some changes. If only more people would be willing to sit down, evaluate themselves, and realize that long-held beliefs are not always the best ones. It's wonderful when people are able to swallow their pride and move forward.
I agree with you. We are far too removed from our food - can't be helped mostly since there is no real way city dwellers could raise their own meat.
Heck, I raise my own meat in the city. Alot of people (including the people who enforce the law) don't realize that in *most* cities and suburban areas, it is at least legal to keep a few hens if nothing else. My chickens live in a small room in my basement at night and in bad weather, and have a small outdoor run to go in when it's nice outside. I think that even if people realized that they *could* do it, they wouldn't. We've become too much of a convenience society. Most people wouldn't be willing to care for, clean up after, feed, and nurture an animal for 6 months until it's big enough to eat. Much easier to run to the store and grab a pack of chicken breasts. Sad, but true.