ron2
Posted : 6/17/2006 6:18:31 PM
I'll be the one Bush-friendly person here. The things you listed are not his fault. For example, Katrina. He signed over funds to Louisiana over 2 days before it made landfall. He did not cause Hurricane Katrina. Guard units and Red Cross units were stationed to enter New Orleans but the mayor of NO and the gov of La told them not to enter as they did not want people trying to go into NO for aid. As for what happend to NO, that is 150 years of mismanagment and Bush is not that old. When military funding cuts became the rage during the Clinton admin., the Corp of Engineers took a hit along with all of the base closings. Bush had nothing to do with that. The city of NO put up a bond election to bolster the levies and the voters turned it down. The Corp of Engineers, what's left of them, has been warning of this problem for a long time and no one would listen. Many of the problems associated with that disaster were either beyond his control or were, at worst, mishandled by FEMA. Houston, OTOH, was a success.
It was not his directive that people be unpunished for taking artifacts from ground zero. Bush did not cause the crash of Flight 93. Nor did he allow bin Laden cronies to hijack the plane. Clinton, OTOH, turned down a few offers to capture bin Laden. I'm not blaming Clinton. Bush is cleaning up the mess left behind by others. I don't agree with everything he does and I think we should leave Iraq. I really wish he would do something about the fuel situation. I also don't think we can fight terrorism with troop movements. It's a special forces war. A SEAL or AFSOC team carries a sniper that does the job, get in, take the shot, get out.
The next president will be a democrat, not because I think the democrats have a better candidate but because I think the republicans don't have as strong a candidate as Bush was. He's not perfect but he is not soley to blame for the problems we have. That gives him way too much power.