ron2
Posted : 2/2/2007 7:54:24 PM
In the past 20 years, the main number of motorcycle accidents involved people who had been riding less than 6 months and who did not take a motorcycle safety course. Translation, yuppies who couldn't wait to show that they would spend $40k on a Harley would buy own and ride to Daytona or Sturgis (The Black Hill Run, back in the day) so that they could feel like "bikers" and wipe out.
Generally speaking, helmets reduce visibility and hearing quite drastically. Most non-fatal head injuries involved lacerations, which can still happen if wearing a peanut shell, as opposed to a full faced Bell. I've read of accidents where a rider was killed while wearing a helmet. Over 90 % of motorcycle accidents involving a car and a motorcycle are the fault of the car driver.
On a motorcycle, you functionally take up the space of a car but you are invisible. People behind you cannot stop as fast as you can.
OTOH, I've watched superbike racing. More than once, I have seen a guy lay the bike down in a turn at literally 120 mph, skid across the tarmac onto the grass, get up and walk away. Usually wearing a helmet but more importantly, he has learned how to get away from a motorcycle going down. There is a specific way.
There are 3 accidents involved in a motorcycle accident. The intitial accident that causes you to lose control. That rarely results in injury. The second accident is where you fall off or are thrown from the motorcycle. Sometimes injury sometimes not. The third accident is when you are hit by someone in traffic after you have been thrown off the motorcycle. That results in great injury and death.
What's more important than the helmet is proper handling of the motorcycle and reading traffic. There are old bikers, there are fast bikers, there are no old, fast bikers.