Aery
Posted : 1/30/2007 8:11:15 AM
You don't need a jungle to own an exotic cat. Zoos are less "qualified" tjhan some of the owners I know and speak to. If you take a look at the link k..m.a posted you'll see that they help people very thoroughly on that board, especially with enclosures.
Yes, many exotics are wild animals. But there are also wild dogs, wild cats, wild birds...etc. Many of these cats have been bred in captivity and sold for a very long time. My own grandmother spoke of people she knew who owned bobcats, very often, and how well they were taken care of.
In most places, you do need a license to keep these animals, and you also need a minimum of a certain number of hours working for someone who works with these animals. Many of their owners are extremely responsible, and take much better care of them than most zookeepers do.
I personally own large reptiles, and I do not have any trouble with them. Perhaps it's my experience that has had them live so long under my care. I have a 7 foot (nose-tip to tail-end) rock iguana that is kept in a large enclosure and treated like a queen. I fought for her to get out of the horrible conditions of a pet store she was in, and they ended up getting shut down.
Monkeys are not an easy pet to keep. They require an experienced owner, as do large cats, wolves/hybrids, etc. It is not the average person who owns these animals and cares for them. And those animals will doubtfully stay in the care of those people for too long if they are treating them badly...people notice a tiger roaming the backyard and usually don't hesitate to call someone and have it placed in a sanctuary. My enclosures for my Caracal were larger than the enclosure at the local zoo for the Tigers.
You can't just look at exotics as viewed by people who have never owned them, or cared for them. If you know someone who bought one, and ended up having to get rid of it, then they weren't qualified to own one. They probably little to no idea on what they were doing, and just wanted that glamour pet status for themselves. But if you can find someone who is extremely passionate about these animals, perhaps you'll understand better.
Some exotic pet owners are baffled by why people keep dogs, just as some dog owners and cat owners are baffled as to why people would keep exotics. If the animals are in good care with an experienced owner, and not being bought from dealers where the money is going to horrible funding to keep the breeding animals fed minimally and in horrible conditions, then these owners don't need to be talked about as if they do not know what they were doing.
The typical response from the general public is "let the wild stay in the wild"...but that's not the case with more than half of the world who own "domestic" pets. They definitely didn't start out that way. And there are many places in other countries where what we view as the pet dog, they view as wild, and yet, they still 'keep' them, but they are not pets. Someone from here wouldn't want an animal like the ones they use. Unfortunately, if it's something out of the standard view of the world, it must be wrong or horrible.
Until you see these owners truly interacting with their animals, you'll never know. And no, I do not mean cases where handlers have been attacked. That rarely happens, and when it does, it is publicized as much as a pit bull attack and makes a terrible name for both animal and owner.
My caracal would have died in the wild. His breeder had had these animals for many many years. They are, essentially, exotic pets, but they were by no means what you would see from these animals in the wild. There are real, noticeable differenced between captive bred and owned animals to those in the wild, especially if you have the rightly trained eye to see them.