probe1957
Posted : 9/1/2006 7:17:14 PM
ORIGINAL: fuzzy_dogs_mom
We'd all like to believe that, Billy. But the fact is that if people really had to be proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, there would be far fewer innocent people in prison and far fewer guilty ones walking around. Unfortunately, a trial is not about getting to the truth, but who has the best lawyer. That's what it boils down to.
Joyce
People do have to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That is the law. And EVERYONE in prison is innocent. [

]
I was once the foreman on a jury. If you ever get a chance to pull jury duty, you should do it, ONCE. Anyway, this case involved a black defendant who was accused of raping his former (white) girlfriend. The members of the jury were not allowed to discuss any aspect of the case until we began deliberations. To me, this was VERY MUCH a case of "he said, she said." Neither of the parties was credible. Someone should have slapped the snot out of both of them, if you know what I mean.
I remember, after the trial, going to the jury room and being scared to death that I was the only one thinking that the prosecution had not overcome the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Right away (after being "elected" foreman) I asked, "Does anyone think this SOB is guilty?" Not a single hand went up. Praise the Lord. There were 4 charges against the guy, 3 major felonies and one minor felony. We acquited on the three major charges right away, and after a bit of discussion, dispensed with the more minor charge the same way.
To Joyce's point, this guy had spent 8 months in jail, , awaiting trial, for charges we the jury decided he was innocent of, because he couldn't afford to bond out and couldn't afford a lawyer who was capable of getting the bond reduced.