ewin0210
Posted : 7/13/2006 10:42:01 PM
Here's another interesting link:
[link
http://www.labbies.com/silver.htm]http://www.labbies.com/silver.htm[/link]
It is genetically "possible" for silver labs to exist. However it would require a color gene mutation for the dilution to occue and this is where the debate lies. Check out the link above its pretty interesting. My guess is that some of these are true silver labs while others are mixes. When "special","unique" variations on a popular breed are brought into play there are many less reputable people willing to do shady things to make a buck. Like crossing a lab with a weim to magically produce the silver lab.
Blue weims are actually fairly similar in this debate in that some believe its a color gene mutation while others believe that it simply started by a non-weim being bred to a weim. Regardless, I think blue weims are beautiful and have the same wonderful temperment as the gray weim. Just because a majority of people do not agree that they should not be allowed to show in conformation, I think its fine for these dogs to be bred if they are evaluated by a judge to have sound conformation AND achieve performance titles AND are health check. Especially since two blue weims can produce silvers. So if they are both exceptional specimens and have been proven, then thier progeny could potentially contribute to the accepted gray standard. And perhaps one day the standard will change to allow blues and long-haired weims(I'd love that! Would be nicer for the colder climates...)
My stance is that even producing "new" breeds isn't a bad thing as long as you're not doing it for the wrong reasons, like making a fast buck. I'm okay with it if you're creating it to serve a purpose. Half the purebred dogs we own wouldn't exist if someone didn't create their breed at some point in time.