New Legislation in CA

    • Gold Top Dog

    New Legislation in CA

    This is part of an article that was in the Sacramento Bee this morning.

    Guard Dog, the surly canine character in the popular comic strip "Mutts", is a pitiable creature. Chained to a stake all day., he's got a fierce demeanor, an angry scowl and a deep need to be loved. "How do you guard against loneliness?" he asks.

    Animal advocates say life is not much better for real dogs that live their lives on chains or ropes.  "They are like ticking time bombs," said Gina Spadafori, a nationally syndicated pet columnist based in Sacramento and author of "Dogs for Dummies."

    A proposed law making its way through the state Legislature would help change that, Spadafori and others said.  If it passes, California would become one of the first states
    in the country to make it illegal to chain or tether dogs to trees, poles or other stationary objects for long periods of time.

    The measure, SB 1578,  is authored by Sen. Alan Lowenthal, D-Long Beach.  It would make it a misdemeanor to tether a dog to a fixed object for more than 3 hours a day. Violators would face fines of up to $1,000 per dog and 6 months in jail.  The bill has cleared the Senate and is scheduled to be heard by the Assembly committee on Tuesday morning.

    Dogs are pack animals by nature and become neurotic and miserable when deprived of interaction with other canines and people, said Spadafori, whose column appears on page 3 of Saturday Scene.  Eventually, she said, they tend to lash out at whoever or whatever crosses their path.

    A study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that chained dogs are nearly three times more likely than untethered canines to bite humans.  Often, it is their owners who become victims. "Dogs are social animals, and when you isolate them they don't recognize their family as family," said Spadafori." They start protecting the pathetic little piece of turf they have, and that's when problems begin.  When you read about dog bites that cause injuries, if's often young, male, unsocialized animals living on chains."

    Joyce

    • Gold Top Dog
    Joyce - I read that in the Bee this morning too and thought "yahoo".   I hope it passes and can't think of any reason why it wouldn't.  It may get amended a few times, but it still sends a very strong message.  I'll be watching it move through the process.
    • Gold Top Dog
    This is great! I hope it passes. Thanks for posting that.
    • Gold Top Dog
    While my first thougth was WOO HOO, my second thought was this......
    People who tether their dogs are irresponsible dog owners, I truly beleive its wrong. What is going to happen when these dogs are not longer tethered? They will still haev some serious aggression issue due to this mistreatment and these types of dogs owners are not the kind to do a abrupt turn around and train adn take care of their dogs. My fear is that their is going to be a larger number of dogs on the loose, thus causing more accidents and issues. Thus inceasing the whole BSL, crapola.
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not against this law, I think its great. I wish they could enforce a law of common sense, decency, and responsible ownership. Ha ha ha, wouldnt that be ideal. My pit bull has taught me the difference between idealism and reality at the very least!
    • Gold Top Dog
    I'm so glad to see this. [linkhttp://ga0.org/campaign/BanDogChainingHouseBill/explanation]http://ga0.org/campaign/BanDogChainingHouseBill/explanation[/link]

    I wish all states would follow suit.

    Good points sheprano