IrishSetterGrl
Posted : 3/30/2010 11:25:02 AM
I guess I just don't understand why a board full of people who love dogs have no problem whatsoever with chopping their body parts off. Just some comments on the pro-body modification arguments...
Tail injury - Yeah, dogs can injure their tails, but they can injure just about every other body part too. They can get their eyes scratched by a branch or another animal. Should we make them wear eye patches, or worse, to prevent an eye injury? Their nails can get caught on something, even if they are trimmed regularly, and have the possibility of being torn out (ouch!). Well, then, let's just remove all their nails when they're pups, too.
Spaying and neutering - Spaying and neutering is VERY different from cropping/docking. C & D is done for aesthetic purposes, so the dog looks "prettier" to us. C & D is done in the interest of the owner, while S & N is done for the dogs' well-being. As you all know, millions of dogs are euthanized in shelters each year...spaying and neutering obviously prevents more unwanted dogs from ending up in the same situation, and it increases the chances of current dogs finding homes (if there are less dogs in shelters, each will have a better change of finding a home). People even voluntarily get their own version of S & N procedures. You won't find people who crop or dock themselves in one way or another. Why? Because it's barbaric...
Owners' rights - You know, I bet when animal abuse laws were enacted, some people said that these laws would prohibit them from practicing their rights as an owner to treat their dogs as they see fit.
Wolves --> dogs - Yes, people domesticated and as a result changed the wolves' behavior and appearance, but (and I could be mistaken) I'm pretty sure they haven't *literally* sculpted the animals. More like, they just bred certain types to achieve the types of dogs we have now.
Historical meaning - I realize some breed standards call for cropping and docking, but that does not mean its okay. I thought the Dobes ears were changed to make them look more intimidating, and the breed originated because a German tax collector needed a tough looking dog to accompany him on his route. I'm also wondering why so many Dobe owners hate that people are afraid of their dogs and make them out the be bloodthirsty killers, yet they continue to desire a look that just encourages that line of thinking (cropped ears DO make dobes look more intimidating, without a doubt). Anyway, many dogs were historically bred to fight...to keep with the spirit of tradition, should we just let dog fights occur?
"Home" C & D - Like another poster said, the same people who are doing their own cropping and docking would continue to do so. Those who have a vet make the amputation are generally much more ethical people, and would not do "homemade" procedures.
Tail docking in banned in the U.K., Australia, France, Austria, Belgium, Germany (with exceptions), Netherlands, India, Sweden, and more. I think it's time we step up to the plate.
Seriously, why would people NOT want C & D to be banned (except for medical emergencies, of course)? It's a protection meant to improve animal welfare. It seems to me that a lot of people claim they love and are concerned for the welfare of dogs, yet can list 100 reasons why they should continue to be unnecessarily put under the knife as puppies. Cropping and docking will definitely eventually be banned in the U.S., it's just a matter of time before we get with it.