labcrab
Posted : 5/17/2006 8:19:31 AM
Really, the more dogs I know - the more convinced I am that the actual breed is NOT the determining factor in intelligence. There are incredibly smart dogs of every breed and conversely - each breed has it's share of dopeys! The other thing, is that we each have our own definition of "smart". I personally do not necessarily equate obedient with intelligent. I consider a dog to be intelligent: when they problem solve - on their own, when they retain information, when they think for themselves. For example, years ago I adopted a retired Seeing Eye Dog. She was my definition of intelligent! She watched the crosswalk lights, then she looked at the traffic. If I wanted her to cross before it was "safe" (in her estimation) she wouldn't. She would actually DISobey me and put on the brakes. She also seemed to figure everything out almost immediately. At 11 years old, she essentially had to learn how to be a pet - having been a strict working dog her entire life. This was no easy feat for a senior.
Also, I think dogs that are highly motivated by *whatever* have an advantage, as they are much more likely to display their intelligence. My boy, Slick is highly motivated by FOOD. He will do AMAZING things when there is food involved - and he will remember EXACTLY what it took to get that treat. Smart? maybe. Without the motivation, I wouldn't even see this side of him. I guess what I'm saying is that, to me - it's not as simple as "smart" and "not-smart". And I don't put any credence into those lists of smartest breeds, etc.
just my humble two cents!