miranadobe
Posted : 12/23/2009 1:23:42 PM
jenns
Based on the criteria many of you are using to define responsible breeders, I'd say 99% of non-puppy mill bereders are not responsible.
Then you would be wrong. It's okay to be wrong if you're willing to learn.
jenns
miranadobe
The solution I agree with most is based partly in educating owners (right down to children, especially) about ethical/responsible breeding practices
And again, what are they going to use this information for? You want millions of people to now go to the responsible breeders?
It's two fold - once you know what is involved in responsible breeding, you can choose a responsible breeder. Or, for hobby breeders, they can choose to become better, more informed and responsible breeders, thus opening up more avenues for puppy seekers. Education is quite enlightening - perhaps the level of BYBs would increase, too, to a more acceptable level by this education. Lamenting "what is" and expecting it to remain the same is counter-productive.
I seriously ask you this - I have read the thread, and plenty of others where you've posted on topics of breeders and ear cropping and other things where you feel dogs are harmed. I give you credit for sticking in to fight for your opinion, and I appreciate it because I believe it's reflective of an aspect of our culture that loves dogs but believes these things that make the rest of us scratch our heads. Anyway, after all this, it still makes me question - why would we all go to shelters to get dogs and boycott ethical breeders? Do you believe any breeders are ethical? Or are they all bad and we should only acquire the messes from people who have oops litters, in order to assuage some guilt over the accident that someone else's irresponsibility caused?
Working backwards through the thoughts, this is how I have interpreted the perspective, so I'm asking for help because the follow through in the thought process has me stumped.
-
We should get dogs from shelters, exclusively.
-
Well, how do they get there? Because someone else took on a dog and was irresponsible with it, or the other percentage who became homeless due to illness or death, let's say.
-
Ok, how did that irresponsible person come to acquire the dog if we operate under the assumption that ethical breeders are off the table?
-
Here is where I'm stuck. They came from shelters before this? They came from oops litters?
-
Or is it really an inhumane thing to keep dogs and we should only be caring for the mistakes of others, the dogs that are suffering, until there is no suffering or mistake litters until all dogs are gone, or wild?