Cita
Posted : 10/28/2009 3:08:41 PM
If it's a personal choice, and not someone else's imposition, then refusing to allow them to "change their name" (really, add another name) is just as bad as refusing to allow them to keep the name that they have.
Example: my name is Courtney. espencer, as a Spanish-speaking person, you must know that my name is pretty much impossible for most Spanish-speaking people to pronounce. They can do "Coor-ney," or "Corny," but the "ort" sound just does not exist in Spanish. If I were to move to a Spanish-speaking country, I would adopt a Spanish-pronounceable name or nickname.
It is beyond frustrating to go into, say, a restaurant and put in a reservation for a table - "Table for two, please" "What's your name?" "Courtney" "What?" "Courtney" "Canny?" "No, Courtney - C-o-u-r-t..." "Uh...." etc. etc. etc. Or to be trying to do something over the telephone and have to spell your name out a million times because the person doesn't understand, because they can't pronounce your name, so the spelling doesn't make sense. Oh, and even after you've spelled it out for them three times, they still write it down wrong.
It's embarrassing and frustrating to have a name that almost nobody can pronounce. It's nobody's fault, it's just one of the consequences of multi-cultural communication.
Nobody should HAVE to take a new name if they don't want to, but if they do want to, they shouldn't have to feel guilty about it, either. Just like someone named "Elizabeth" might want to go by "Beth," or someone else want to be called by their middle name, why shouldn't someone named "Yu-san" be able to go by something like "Amy" if they really want to?