ron2
Posted : 10/1/2008 5:53:24 PM
Myra
But like the McCain campaign, you're repeating an outright lie
Interesting. I quoted a Snopes judgement in one of these debates before and that Snopes judgement was rejected because it was truthful about McCain.
So, and not saying it's you, but in this forum, accepting a snopes judgement depends on the politics. It does, however note, that he did have contact with them and it was about advice, though, as the snopes article is saying, they are not his financial advisors, now.
So, are you calling me a liar or am I guilty of a sin if I have repeated something deemed a lie?
And I think I mispoke earlier. You are right, the house hasn't voted, but it is expected to pass. But where has Obama been in this resolution other than taunting McCain into the debate? His camp said that McCain should be able to multi-task, solving the economic woes of companies Obama was linked to (Obama represented ACORN in a lawsuit in Illinois) while debating him. So, McCain took time away from the campaign and a night away from trying to solve the economic gordian knot left by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae because Obama wasn't going to stop campaiging even for a moment and was going to show up any way, forcing a forfeit. Oh, so classy ...
ETA:
I've been trying to independently confirm your list of his economic advisors but I haven't found it, yet.
ETA II:
According to Obama's own website, this is his economic advisor.
"Austan Goolsbee
Goolsbee is the Senior Economic Advisor to the Obama campaign. He is a professor of economics at the University of Chicago and a Fulbright Scholar. The Financial Times named him one of the six Gurus of the Future/Best Under 40 in 2005, and the World Economic Forum in Switzerland chose him one as one of the 2005 Young Global Leaders. He received his Master's Degree in Economics from Yale in 1991 and his Ph.D. in the same subject in 1995 from Massachusetts Institute of Technology."
So, I'm still trying to find the source of the names you listed. It would appear that neither one of us got it right.
ETA:
I googled the names you listed and got this.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&refer=home&sid=abKPolAPZtx4
They are not exactly part of his campaign troops but he was meeting with them to discuss economic issues, maybe in a similar vein to talks with the CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before they ran off with all their money.