Benedict
Posted : 12/23/2008 9:06:04 AM
Liesje
My understanding is that a Pyr should defend it's flock without hesitation, it should not wait for the human to come out asses the threat, and command the dog.
Exactly right, and the reason for that is all of the Big White Dogs (and some which are not white, Anatolians and Bergamascos and such) were developed to be left alone to guard. In the case of the BWDs, shepherds would leave them with the flocks while they attended to business elsewhere, safe in the knowledge that the dogs had spent every waking and sleeping moment with the flock almost since birth and should the need arise, would defend the flock at all costs.
And that gets to the heart of why I would not recommend a Pyr for this situation even if you discount the unpredictable attack threshold. LGDs bond with what they know, and they protect what they know. Working puppies are placed with sheep within weeks after birth, are rarely separated from their flocks until they become too old to guard, and can become very uneasy if they are removed from their flock for any length of time. These are traits which define LGDs, and no one should ever forget that Pyrs are LGDs, even if raised as pets the humans, other dogs, birds, guinea pigs and kids in the vicinity become their "flock". The OP's partner wants a dog who will attack if needed but be a best friend to the kids and a Pyr WILL NOT bond strongly enough to kids it only sees a few times a month to be their best friend. At best, it will tolerate or ignore them, accepting pats and strokes but never truly love them, and at worst....well, that's where unpredictable termperaments come in. There is a significant possibility that the dog will view the kids as intruders when one of them suddenly does something alarming even if it has been fine with them for months. Wanting the dog to bond with the kids implies a level of trust I would never grant to any breed of LGD regarding anything it does not see daily.