Pomeranian <3
Posted : 1/27/2008 9:36:05 AM
First off I think I'm miss communicating or something because everything you are saying I agree with minus the pom & the spitz being pretty much the same dog subject.
Breeding should be extremely well thought out, planned, etc. A well thought out litter would not produce a Pomeranian like mine for example. You don't breed two Ch. dogs together and get one that looks totally different....
YES you can get "pet quality" dogs that don't exact have show quality or perfect breed standards but you don't get a TOTALLY different dog! What I am saying is my dog (for example) there is not a single thing about her that is the "breed standard" of a Pomeranian.
The way I sometimes look at it... is if you think about it, a Pomeranian is actually a designer dog in their own sense. No longer of course, but totally used to be. They were bred down from a 30lb dog then "dwarfed" into a totally different looking dog.
I looked up Spitz and I'm saying (for EXAMPLE) Kayla meets pretty much all the requirements to be THAT dog... but no where near the requirements of a Pomeranian. I also looked up how we just "throw the two dogs together in the same category" meaning that even if there WAS a german spitz, we wouldn't call it that, we'd just called it a Pomeranian and register it as a Pomeranian. That's what I mean by "just because it happens often doesn't make it right" I think THIS is wrong. So that actually does mean... just because it is registered as a Pom doesn't make it a Pom... keep in mind that if a german spitz came over here for example and had a litter WE WOULD CALL THEM POMS. I don't know WHY but that's what we do. We throw the two different dogs together. That's the "problem" I'm talking about.
Height, Width, Coat, Nose, Face, Ears, Eyes, Tail, Back Legs (of Kayla) ALL don't meet the breed standard... that doesn't " just happen sometimes" in a well thought out litter. THAT is a really really bad litter. When I talk to people who breed their Ch. Poms they dont just GET 14lb Poms or Spitz looking Poms... they get "pet quality" Poms meaning they may not win events in the ring b/c of one or two features like not a very thick coat, or ears too far apart... not a HUGE list! Pet quality doesn't mean a totally different DOG!!!
I understand the part you are talking about with human babies... I've never seen this happen with dogs before. Nor has any of my breeders told me about horrible stories such as that happening to their own dogs... so I'm not sure that its safe to say a human pregnancy and a dog pregnancy is the same thing. Maybe it does happen? I just don't know a single person who has ever witnessed it yet.
7lb dog that doesn't have a strong champion bloodlines yes maybe they will produce a baby of 9-13lbs. Yes that COULD happen. But everyone knows a 7lb Pom should not be breed. Everyone knows you shouldn't breed your dog unless you know the dog is of extreme high quality to better the breed. And even if so that's not even the only reason why you should breed (I know there are sooo many other issues and thoughts that need to go into a breeding). The "problem" is people get a Pom and think its so cute and they love it and want to breed it (the infamous back yard breeder) my dogs so nice I'll breed it and make some money off it in the meantime; or the famous "i just want one pup from the litter". THESE are the people that create dogs like Kayla for example. These are the people that create 14lb "Pomeranains". I can guarentee to you no reputable breeder I talk to has EVER had a pup from their litter be over 8lbs. Its just pure genetics, they have extremely long lines of Ch. breeding and each litter is so well planned out its crazy! THAT is who you buy dogs from... THOSE people...
Trust me I also understand the fact if we stop buying from BYB and Puppy Mills and Pet Stores thats the only way it will stop. I've spent so much of my time dedicated to educating people about this. The problem is that people don't SEE the problem. Kayla is no where near what a Pom should look like... to the point that she probably could in fact be called a different dog if we lived else where. I want people to know this because it is important. Kayla is not just "pet quality" I've seen pet quality Poms and been like "that's not show quality?!"
I love my dog to death. I rescued this pup and she is seriously my child. I love her no matter what the heck she truly is. Aside from that I know she is the protiege of horrible breeding.
Does any of that make any sense???
Okay take idk something basic like a LAB for example. Everyone has a fairly good idea about what a lab looks like right? Okay so what if the lab had flopped over ears (like an Aussie for example). And his tail curled up (like a Pom for example).... Would you call that a "pet quality" lab, or would you go "hmmm that CAN'T be pure bred...." An example like this, is the type of problem we have with Pomeranians. In the world of Pomeranian we'd just call the Lab "oh its a pure bred its just pet quality" HA! That lab is NOT "just pet quality" its deff a mix of some kind or went through a really long line of bad breeding...
Does that make sense...???
I'm seeing if I am communicating it better this time?