Lynn
Posted : 6/26/2007 7:30:31 PM
I just spent 30 minutes doing a sincere apology and explaining how I was out of line and why the doctors would have a good reason to only do a sigmoid on him. There is no way I can re-create that post now.
And, I just fed the dogs and must walk them. So, I'm going to summerize what I wrote.
1) I am truly sorry for causing you more pain. I should not have been so blunt. I feel very bad about causing you more worry. It was insensitive and unnecessary.
2) There are a lot of good reasons for a doctor to only call for a sigmoid. For example, if a person has high blood pressure, or heart problems, then that tilts the scale quite a bit. I think that the odds of having a polyp in the upper portion and not having one in the lower portion would be very slim. So, from a doctors point of view, why do the full scope when they can do just the sigmoid, get a good idea of what's going on, and not stress the organs or blood pressure for these sensitive individuals. This would be a better protocol for many individuals. I would imagine that in the majority of cases that they will find something in the lower portion, if there is going to be something in the upper portion as well. If they do find a polyp in the lower section, then they will feel the need to do a full scope outweighs the other factors. But, until then, it doesn't. They are thinking of the entire person and their personal issues.
3) I don't know what DH's issues are. Maybe the doctor truly thinks it is not polyps. I am sure he is going to a qualified doctor who is making decisions based on his full case history.
4) Again, I feel terrible for making you worry more. Please don't. I was out-of-line to say things the way I did. It does make sense as to why a doctor would only prescribe a sigmoid in some cases. I was thinking of the time off work, the worry, etc, and thinking it just makes sense to do the whole thing. But, for some people, it wouldn't be in their best interest.
Please forgive me for being so insensitive.