spiritdogs
Posted : 4/17/2006 8:06:27 PM
Spirit you are certainly at liberty to take your dogs to whatever behaviourist you like, what concerns me is there are behaviourists and trainers on this forum who have not once commented on the long term and daily crating of dogs, they should personally look at your own moral standpoint and look at the long term welfare of the dogs not the short term gain that people listening to your advice that may then come to you.
To others who are reading this thread, please avail yourselves the opportunity to visit the PAACT webpage and view the Code of Ethics, especially #12.
I did not mean that I would
literally take my dogs to a behaviorist, but that I would feel comfortable taking them to Mic if they needed one, which they don't. Thankfully, I must be doing something right, as I am fortunate enough to have five lovely, obedient, well-adjusted dogs.
As to the long term welfare of dogs, I think it makes more sense to insure the immediate safety of the dog, then work on the issues gradually. We are talking here of a dog that has only been in his new home for a short time, and needs more time to adjust. Right now, he is anxious. Whether he will be anxious in a few months, who knows? From my own experience with a rescued hound, I can say that he was a very fearful boy when he first came here, but in a few months, he was right at home, and is now a registered therapy dog.
I used some simple confidence building techniques, classical & operant conditioning.