Lee Charles Kelley
Posted : 3/11/2008 4:21:10 PM
Kim_MacMillan
I certainly think so, and have read quite a bit of literature in journals discussing deception in animals. I think deception for wild animals, in an evolutionary sense, is required for the survival of some of those animals. Its' a part of hunting for predators, it's a part of survival for prey, and I've seen some of the most amazing behaviours occur in the wild that have been classified as deception.
There are a lot of cases of dog-aggro pitty dogs who will actually play bow to other dogs, enticing other dogs to come forward, seemingly for a friendly greeting, so that they can have access to fighting. It's a very bizarre behaviour chain, but rather cunning to observe. I've seen such amazing behaviours in my guys in which I would have to reach to find a way to describe it that is not deception. I see it in play styles, I see it in the manner to which they obtain resources they want. I've seen one girl who I call a little deceptive fiend, as she is so smart, she plays this super-submissive game and can successfully get ahold of any toy that she wants, whenever she wants it, regardless of who has it. Some dog trainers have actually given a name to this type of dog, who literally weasle their way into getting what they want. It's so amazing to see.
It's interesting to see how your mind tends to go automatically to the idea that the dog is doing something deliberately. I've worked with dogs who do the same behavior you've described above, of doing a play bow as if inviting the dog to play, and then becoming aggressive the instant the other dog gets close enough. I've never once thought it was a ploy or deception. My feeling has always been that the play bow reflected the first dog's feelings of social attraction for, and a desire to play with, the other dog. But when the other dog actually got up close (too close, in fact), that kind of proximity, and the energy inherent to it, was too much for the first dog to handle, and so he or she attacked out of fear. In terms of pit bulls, many of the pits I've worked with seem to have been trained or conditioned to only be aggressive when the other dog was in his or her "space." They're fine as long as the other dog keeps its distance.At any rate, I've seen this behavior and I always thought it was simply a matter of a desire to play followed by an emotional energy overload which resulted in a fear reaction, which sparked the attack. I never once saw this as a deliberate attempt to fool the other dog.
As for the "deceptive fiend" you also described (not fully enough, but I kind of get the picture), this behavior reminds me of the way a supposedly submissive female will steal a dead hare or rabbit from her mate. I've described it on my website as follows:
"The
male has killed a hare and comes trotting back toward the den where,
presumably, he wants to eat his kill in peace and safety. As he
approaches, the female comes toward him. His neck and back go up. He
stands tall and stiff. She approaches, low to the ground. The closer
she comes, the stiffer he stands. The stiffer he gets, the lower she
gets to the ground. Then as she comes right up to him, while he’s
growling and standing firm, she very nearly rolls over on her back in
the way the inferior wolf in Lorenz’s description does. Here, though,
she’s not on her back and not offering her neck. So why is she so low
to the ground?
The next part of the drama explains it: crouching in front of her mate,
so low to the ground as to almost be on her back, her jaws are actually
now in a perfect position to grab the hare right out of the male’s
mouth. Which is exactly what she does! Then she runs back to her pups,
leaving the male standing there, hare-less and “wondering” what the
hell just happened."
However, I can see that if one were to stick in some way to the "submissive" model of pack behavior then one might confuse what the female does as a deliberate ploy. I don't see it that way. I see it as a mixture of desire to obtain the prey animal for her pups, mixed with a natural reaction to the male's stronger emotional energy. So she comes toward him in a way that isn't deceptive at all, at least not from her perspective. It's simply the safest and quickest way for her to get what she wants. In terms of your deceptive fiend of a female, it's probably not only an instinctive but also a learned behavior. But either way it can still be explained satisfactorily as a matter of emotional energy flow, not deliberate deception, which would require that the dog have a theory of mind.
Also, you mention "quite a bit of literature in journals" on this topic. I've seen that too. My feeling is that if the people who take this view were to look at behavior from a interdisciplinary standpoint, they wouldn't be making this error. Even just looking at your deceptive fiend of a female through the lens of emergence theory, you'd see (perhaps, if you were open to seeing) that there's no deception going on.
Anyway, that's how I look at it.
LCK