tssst
Posted : 2/3/2008 8:59:18 PM
Hi Luvmyswissy,
When you say things like "I am not a Cesar lover or hater! And.. I have learned to stay away from the topic. But you did strike a nerve BECAUSE I find these statements so over exaggerated by people who have overblow opinons on a subject they really know nothing about.", I can not help but think of what was previously stated:
Ron2
(Ceasar) kicks to the dog's hind-quarters. He doesn't kick hard enough to make a 20 yard field goal but he is physically impacting the dog.
I would like to know how it was determined if it was a kick or somethig else such as a tap. A comparison was also made that his "kick" was not as hard as a 20-yard field goal. However, when somebody makes such a statement, the visual impact is left behind for others to read and form opinions as if what was being stated was cold factual information.
I would like to ask Ron to cut that number by 1/2. And then ask how much measured force it takes to kick a 10 yard field goal. Do the same measurement for a 5 yard field goal. Then measure how hard Ceasar uses his foot on the hind quarters of a dog to get the dogs attention. When this exercise is done in a scientific fashion, then we can talk about whether what Ceasar does with his foot constitutes a kick or a touch. Until then, it is exactly as Luvmyswissy states, overblown emotion.
I suspect that a kick s hard as a 5 yard field goal would knock the dog over. I suspect that tapping the dog on the hind quarters might be using as much force as it would take for me to stand next to Ron and give him a tap on his left shoulder to get his attention.
The distortion in statements like this tend to perpetuate myth, and it is rather unfortunate, in my opinion, especially coming from more scientifically inclined and/or professional people. I agree with you Lovmyswissy. Everyone not only has oipinions, but many of the people who dislike this man the most have personal agendas.
tssst