Kim_MacMillan
Posted : 12/23/2007 9:09:00 AM
ron2
Interesting points and I'm not just replying to you, Carla. I am still inclined to agree with Spencer's statement that is related to overprotecting in that the dog that receives affection while in a fearful state will find more reasons to be fearful because being that way gets rewarded. Which, again, proves that dogs, like other creatures will seek what is rewarding. Other times, a dog may truly have a fear that is there, reward or not.
Ron, would you be willing to read what I referred to earlier? The modern research that indicates that comfort does not actually reinforce fear at all, that at best it works, and at worst does nothing at all? By this I mean true comfort, not coddling (Ooh baby it's okay, don't worry about that, with person being anxious as well trying to make their dog better). What is comfort for each dog is different, but I have had extreme success in comforting dogs with fears. For Gaci, providing comfort comes in the way of T-touch massage, quiet slow tones, and slow body-length strokes of the body. When she relaxes she also takes part in some of her favorite activities. Providing comfort is one way that can actually assist you in classical conditioning. Some people have conditioned a "Relax" cue, done during times of extreme calmness, and when used in the presence of a scary thing, can actually physiologically begin to relax the body, despite the dog's fears, so the two things are in conflict with each other.
When I took Gaci to the vet the other day, her first instinct was to bark (even though she's becoming less phobic, she's still fearful). Distracting her, inviting her up onto the chair beside mine, having her lay down, and using massage, she actually relaxed almost totally, laying her head on my chair. When people walked by, she looked up at first, then would lay her head back down. Eventually when people walked by she didn't even bother to look over. This comfort is also classically conditioning her response to people at the vet - food is not the only requirement!
I did the same for dogs who were scared of thunder and found that providing actual comfort - not coddling (they are different!) - can work very well. When my dogs are scared or injured, they come to me immediately. It's usually their first reaction. I know for many people it'sthe same way for their dogs. When they do that, they are seeking that you are acknowledging their fear. They are coming to you because you are their safety, their rock, who they trust. If you ignore that, or push it away, what message do you think that is saying? Lack of acknowledgement or rejection is recognized across species. I have had dogs who, when ignored, got much worse, because their anxiety about the feared thing remained, and now their person is also blowing them off, and they lack a temporary safe person. Simply letting your dog be with you can be comforting.
The idea that comfort enhances fears is an old one, but I really don't think it's a true one. I do think there are ways to stengthen fears, but that then is not comforting. As somebody on the Shyk9's list says in regards to comfort - if what you're doing is making your dog better, keep doing it. If it's making your dog worse, then stop doing it. Pretty simple, and this way you can find out just what is "comfort" to your dog. For some dogs it can be touch, for some dogs it can be voice, for some dogs it can be hiding underthe covers, for others it can be simply acknowledging them, for others it may be something different. But comfort is comfort, and comfort does not strengthen fears. Dogs comfort other dogs, too, just in different ways because dogs communicate differently. If we can learn what comforts our dogs in times of stress, we can then use that to make our dogs' fears less.