DPU
Posted : 7/11/2008 9:00:06 AM
SirDrakeOfTheCreek
The whole point of the
comment I made above was to find what motivates and works for the dog and then I make that work in my favor. I feel like I'm missing something here??
My
simple forumula is a dog's willingness to perform an exercise is
directly correlated to the human-dog relationship. Any and all
motivators should be of a lesser value to the dog, that is what I think
all dog owners should strive toward. What I see is that humans do
not understand that through their actions, motivators are influenced in
intensity resulting in misplaced behavior problems such as
countersurfing, obsessions, and all sorts of other anxiety
related conditions. Motivators are even created by humans and then again
misplaced.
A good example of this is when I take out the dog's
collars resulting in the dogs getting very excited. Through
repetition and a schedule, they know that collars means a car
ride. Is it fair to use that trigger to request behavior? I
define what the collar means to the dog and the expected outcome when
it appears. I created the motivator that puts the dog in a WANT
mode. If I deviate from the expected outcome, the motivator will
increase or decrease in intensity, thus changing the natural balance
within the dog.
I see nothing wrong with the CM video. What
you are seeing in that video is the start of the relationship. CM
has not established any relationship, connection, or bond with the
dog. The dog is not willing to do what CM wants because no
defined language has been established. If you watch more of CM
videos you will see this rough start all the time. But, as the
relationship builds, the dog is more willing and CM is less, lets
say...rough. If I had the courage, that is how I would do it to
'red zone' dog and I suspect those that say they would do it in a
different way, probably would never have such a dog in their home.