probe1957
Posted : 10/17/2006 2:38:58 PM
This thread has been very interesting to me, even if it did go OT just a tad back there a page or two ago.
A couple of things occurred to me as I was reading through the musings. First, it seems to me that there is plenty of mud slinging that goes on, from both sides of the fence, regarding training. To suggest that this is one sided is at best, disingenuous. Traditional trainers, for example, are often called "yank and crank" and now, apparently, "pro-spanking." These are hardly terms used to promote harmony among those who might have a different viewpoint than the person who uses them.
I get a kick out of some of the people here who preface their comments with something like, "I'm a trainer." Big deal, so is my 19 year old neighbor girl. What exactly does "I'm a trainer" mean anyway? Anyone can call themselves a trainer. Heck, anyone can BE a trainer. The only certification required to be a trainer, I guess, is to come on some internet forum and declare yourself one. Apparently some believe, once you are so "certified," your opinion on training must be taken by others as gospel. I, for one, am unimpressed.
Now I don't have any problem with good, honest debate. I have learned a lot, right here on idog, by listening to ALL sides of an argument and then forming some kind of conclusion. I don't even know what a clicker looks like. The only training I have ever been exposed to has been the traditional, yank and crank, pro-spanking stuff. BTW, has ANYONE here EVER advocated spanking a dog or was this a comment that was deliberately designed to inflame? Only the OP knows for sure. [

]
When it comes to training, I believe different strokes for different folks.