Working Dogs Crossover to Companions

    • Gold Top Dog
    Do you think that maybe some dogs are more sensitive/responsive to psychological pressure, where others are to physical? So as we talk about the varying levels of corrections, a dog could take on psychological pressure "easier" than physical, and vise versa?
    • Gold Top Dog
    I don't like to think of it as what the dog can "take" - if you think of working towards the one thing, at that moment, that will get the dog to say, "Oh, what?" then you are able to break free of the labels of soft dog, hard dog, physical versus psychological, etc, etc.

    As I say Cord's a big softie when it comes to physical pressure, but that doesn't mean I avoid it. It means it's there as a tool when he needs it. He gets into this mode where he's "running scared" - not thinking at all - and nothing will break it but my getting in his face. Once I do that I can switch back to verbal corrections and all's well - in fact he normally makes a big leap forward after one of these episodes. It makes my heart happy to say that these are very rare now.

    Ben on the other hand is the opposite. You can shout until you are blue in the face and it will only excite him. He didn't make much progress at all on sheep until I learned to control my body language. Again, this doesn't mean verbal corrections are not useful - I've developed a vocabulary with him so that I don't have to use physical pressure at all most of the time, which is inconvenient when actually working sheep.

    Ted's not a dog you can fit in categories. He's a good all-around dog - he responds very nicely but you do have to make sure his attention is engaged. The important thing to remember about Ted is that with incorrect timing he gets very quickly immune to any attention-getting technique.

    Laura's pup, who is almost the same age, is light years ahead of Ted - first because he matured very early, second because Laura's got a really nice natural feel for all this, and third because he is very responsive. Ted's going to take some work before he settles down and is as trustworthy as Nick, but that's OK. I'm losing some weight running around. [:D]

    But I had a youngster who was super, super prey driven, with absolutely no desire to work for people. That was a scary dog to work. The older she got, the more she was looking for an opportunity to kill something. She was a darling dog, very sweet to people, slept on my bed and even loved our cat - but she was put together wrong, mentally, to work sheep. She wasn't too "soft" - she just didn't have that piece that tells a dog to stop and wonder if it's okay to . . .

    I loved her to death but she had no business on a sheep farm. She'd get out the back door and bolt for the sheep pasture and see what she could do before someone caught her. Not good.

    So to stop rambling and get back to the actual question, I do think that it's best to look at the situation, rather than try to put the dog in little boxes and assume everything can be explained by the labels that I put on the dog.

    I'm crossing my fingers. I've got new batteries charging. I want to try to get some footage tomorrow.
    • Gold Top Dog
    There are some dogs I'd never train this way. However, a correction does not automatically shut down every dog - if it is appropriate for the dog and the situation. Just my 2cents.

     
    absolutely true. Super-soft sensitive Baxter turns into a hard, insensitive dog when his prey drive kicks in, and then I have used minor corrections to get his attention back on me with no adverse impact on his psyche.
    Every dog is different.
    • Gold Top Dog
    There are some dogs I'd never train this way. However, a correction does not automatically shut down every dog - if it is appropriate for the dog and the situation. Just my 2cents.


    absolutely true. Super-soft sensitive Baxter turns into a hard, insensitive dog when his prey drive kicks in, and then I have used minor corrections to get his attention back on me with no adverse impact on his psyche.
    Every dog is different.


    I totally agree here. Lucy's got a massive prey drive. I've tried training "leave it" with the clicker until I'm blue in the face, but after rewarding only a few successful "leave its" in order to end a squirrel fit - she quickly chains those behaviors and *looks* for squirrels to freak over so I can reward her for a successful "leave it." I tried asking for leave its at random, I tried asking for other behaviors, and I've tried ignoring the squirrel fits, but that was too self-rewarding. Unless I throw an aversive like a body block inbetween a self-rewarding behavior and an alternate behavior she will chain them after just a few repetitions and the behavior increases. Ask poor Cletus the cat... he still thinks Lucy's gonna get him whenever he sees me getting out the dog cookie jar.

    Now, a squirrel fit or cat attack will end when I stand up and say "out" then give he an alternate "prey" (aka squeakie). If I don't let her know that I don't want some behaviors, she'll continue to do them - some unwanted behaviors are too rewarding, and any reward that is high-value enough to distract her from the self-rewarding behavior ends up increasing *both* behaviors. Now we don't really reward another behavior, I just make it easier for her to chase squeakies (acceptable) than it is to beat on my windows when she sees a squirrel (unacceptable). Squeakies are only more rewarding than squirrels because I made squirrels unacceptable through body blocking.
    • Gold Top Dog
    Here is a conversation I found, some might find interesting. A few points from trainer who works with hunting dogs...
    http://dog.draminski.com/news/article.php?group=alt.animals.dog&id=
    %3C1176194541.295896.125820%40n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com%3E)


    Here's a better way: *you* could train a retriever using nothing but
    positive reinforcement. And then *I* could train one using not only
    positive reinforcement, but negative reinforcement, positive and
    negative punishment, too, and, say, then we entered a field trial and
    competed mano a mano and doggo a doggo. Then we'd get to see whose
    hypotheses was strongest, wouldn't we?



    Here's the rub: it's impossible to train a retriever using nothing but
    positive reinforcement because the retrieving of a shot flyer (bird)
    is THE most powerful primary reinforcer there is to a high-drive
    retriever, and therefore a self-rewarding behavior. It trumps any
    other primary reinforcer you can use.

    You can train just about anything else, like heeling or weave poles,
    using retrieving as the reward/primary reinforcer for a keen
    retriever. And you can train less exciting retrieves using positive
    reinforcers that the dog considers "higher-value" than the object
    being retrieved (i.e., picking up a tossed dumbbell using a piece of
    hot dog as the primary reinforcer). A lot also depends on the strength
    of the conditioned reinforcer being used - a truly operant dog will
    often perform for the conditioned reinforcer in spite of a low-value
    primary because of prior training/conditioning and work ethic.

    But until you can really precisely control when, how and even whether
    the dog gets the bird, as well as be able to deliver a higher-value
    primary reinforcer plus a valid secondary/conditioned reinforcer
    followed by that primary instantaneously and at any distance at any
    time during the retrieve, well, you'll just be whistling Dixie back
    there at the line. And the dog will continue along its merry way
    toward the self-reinforcement of finding the bird.

    And I propose that your experience with trying to train a retriever to
    compete in a field trial would be similarly unsuccessful if you tried
    to do it using only positive reinforcement.



    And I concur, but for different reasons. If I had, say, an electric
    collar that delivered an impulse directly into the pleasure centers of
    the dog's brain (would still have to be greater than the pleasure of
    finding a bird, though) I DO believe I could train a field trial
    retriever using primarily positive reinforcement.

    When I used an e-collar to train retrievers, I wouldn't have thought
    that possible either. But I have learned a TON about positive
    reinforcement/ negative punishment since I started agility. And I
    train entirely differently for obedience now than I did then, too. I'm
    not a clickeroo by any stretch, and I use liberal "corrections", but I
    don't "punish" before I teach any more, either.

    And that's why I asked for what it would take to convince you
    otherwise, right?

    The above scenario, I think, would go a looooooong way towards
    convincing you just how effective the judicious use of a combination
    of P+, P-, R- and R+ can be.

    I'd even bet on it. I'd even give you odds. :)

    Wanna give it a try?

    Anyone else wanna give it a try?



    I did. Didn't work. But I contend it is as likely a result of
    inability to control the primary and conditioned reinforcers at a
    distance due to lack of high tech equipment that would equate with the
    remote training collar's ability to deliver P+/R- as it is the fault
    of the methodology.

    So, since my pleasure-center collar doesn't exist, let's even up the
    field, what you say? I challenge you to train an agility dog using the
    same "judicious" combination of P+, P-, R- and R+ that you now use to
    train a field trial retriever - in other words, in approximately the
    same proportions that you use in the field. You could keep your own
    records as to how much/how often you used each, and just stick to that
    ratio for this challenge.

    *MY* bet is that when the behavior you're training is not THE #1 most
    all-powerful self-reinforcing thing there is to a keen retriever, but
    something with much less inherent pleasure (weaving in and out 12
    poles sticking up out of the ground, for example) then using primarily
    P+ and R- will fail to motivate the dog to perform the task with
    anywhere near the speed and consistency of a dog trained to do it with
    primarily R+ and P-.

    I even have a dog I'll loan you to do it with. And she's already
    collar conditioned, to boot.

    I'd even bet on it. I'd even give you odds. :)

    Wanna give it a try?

    Anyone else wanna give it a try?
    :->

    • Gold Top Dog
    to all be instinctive-- the dog already knows how to do it, and with some practice he gets better at it.

     
    I have a case in point for that. BIL and his family got a new dog last fall. A Blue Merle Australian Shepherd. Without any training for it, she herds and pins the ball they play with. She will chase, bump, and then stop and stand over the ball, just as if she were cutting a sheep from the flock and waiting for you to come over and vaccinate or tag or shear or whatever you were going to do. I accidently discovered another talent of hers. At close range, if you toss the ball at her, she will bounce it back to you. None of this was trained and is seemingly innate.
     
    • Gold Top Dog
    ORIGINAL: ron2

    to all be instinctive-- the dog already knows how to do it, and with some practice he gets better at it.


    I have a case in point for that. BIL and his family got a new dog last fall. A Blue Merle Australian Shepherd. Without any training for it, she herds and pins the ball they play with. She will chase, bump, and then stop and stand over the ball, just as if she were cutting a sheep from the flock and waiting for you to come over and vaccinate or tag or shear or whatever you were going to do. I accidently discovered another talent of hers. At close range, if you toss the ball at her, she will bounce it back to you. None of this was trained and is seemingly innate.



    Who stole Sequoyah and painted her blue? [:D]

    You are correct that many Aussies have these innate abilities.  They also don't seem to care that the ball that just zonked them on the nose would make you or I see stars for a week...they're instantly ready for more.   As if the bull just bumped them back and they were plotting their next move.  Um, let's see - head or heel. [;)]
    My girl is always in a "what do want me to do next" frame of mind.  Workaholic little red speckled monstah...
    That biddability combined with drive makes for a highly trainable dog, but one that can easily get away from you.  Most people (Becca, I'm talking pet owners here) opt for correction because they aren't quick enough to figure out how to stay ahead of such a smart AND driven dog.  So, they are playing catch up trying to fix the things that their little "one trial learner" has figured out for herself. [:D]

    • Gold Top Dog
    Who stole Sequoyah and painted her blue?

     
    They got her from a breeder local to them near Baton Rouge, La. But she comes from a seemingly good line with stable temperment. Their old dog, Jesse, is boss and Cassie kisses up to her. But she'll cut that ball out of the herd everytime you send it out.
     
    • Gold Top Dog
    Becca et all, I just wanted to let you know that I had great enjoyment in reading all of this post. It is a great in-depth look into real working dogs, doing what they are bred to do. And it's interesting to learn more about your philosophies on working with individual dogs, and some of your stories. Even if you do some things I wouldn't (not to mention my dogs don't do the jobs yours do and I don't have such high needs for them), I still find it a very educational thread.

    I see in many instances where you refer to using "pressure" or "physical pressure" in working with your dogs. I'm wondering if you'd be interested in elaborating a little more on what you mean by that, and perhaps provide a few examples? What IS "pressure" for you, and how do you apply it. Is it a spatial concept, where you are controlling the dog's space (such as moving into the dog's space, or away from the dog's space as needed), or is it a physical concept, where you are physically applying pressure to the dog? I'm interested in learning more about this concept if you have time to share. [:)]
    • Gold Top Dog
    I think an interesting question would be how many people actually work dogs. Some have dogs that are into agility trials but are also companion dogs. I can think of three people with dogs that work cattle. Spiritdogs, Brookscove, and Buster the Show Dog. Out of 20 or 30 regulars and maybe a 100 or more lurkers. Of the 3 working dog people, 2 use aversives. One person here runs a dog sled in winter, mainly for recreation, I believe, on a trail on their own property. Another is training his dogs to be sled dogs but does in harness on the road, with no aversives. (No, I wasn't referring to myself.) There might be more, I don't know. Maybe some have their hounds or Labs in field trials. And out of all of those, what is the prevalent training method and level of success?
     
    ETA: I also stipulate that someone, such as Brookscove, uses more than one style, whatever she sees fit for the dog and the given circumstances. I think that is also a plausible category. One style, more than one style. I also understand the desire for some to define correction as something more like aversive or re-direction, such as stepping into the boundary space of the dog, as opposed to using a scruff and pin where a person's weight is on the dog.
    • Puppy

    ORIGINAL: ron2

    I think an interesting question would be how many people actually work dogs.... I can think of three people with dogs that work cattle. Spiritdogs, Brookscove, and Buster the Show Dog..... And out of all of those, what is the prevalent training method and level of success?

    ETA: I also stipulate that someone, such as Brookscove, uses more than one style, whatever she sees fit for the dog and the given circumstances.



    Actually, I've worked most of my dogs on sheep, and give lessons to some friends, but I've only tried one dog on cattle, and that was only a couple times when I had the opportunity to work a few nice cooperative young steers. Something I'd like to do more of, but not badly enough to actually purchase cows....
    In addition to herding, I've done some formal obedience on a few dogs, done a fair amount of tracking, and dabbled in agility. Of the eight dogs I've owned, not surprisingly, they've had different talents, and so I've concentrated on different things, and used different training approaches with each dog. Five dogs have earned TD's with three of them going on to earn TDX's. Training there is very much reward based, but I wouldn't call it Clicker Training per se. It's closer to using lures to train than "pure" clicker training. My two best obedience dogs earned UD's, others earned CD's or CDX's. Again, I would say I used more lure training than pure Clicker Training. It seems to me that in this part of the world at least, it seems that lots of people start out Clicker Training for beginning obedience, but by the time they get to the higher levels it's more "training with a clicker", rather than pure CT. And herding - a couple dogs with advanced titles through AKC and American Herding Breeds Association (I work with loose eyed dogs so I won't be out in the open class at Border Collie trials any time soon ;-)), others with assorted started and intermediate level titles. And most of them have made themselves useful as all round chore dogs, although some more so than others ;-) Hopefully you'll get a bit of an idea of the nature of herding training from my answer to Kim's question about pressure, and I'm sure Brookcove will also provide great insight there as well.
    • Puppy

    ORIGINAL: Kim_MacMillan

    ......
    I see in many instances where you refer to using "pressure" or "physical pressure" in working with your dogs. I'm wondering if you'd be interested in elaborating a little more on what you mean by that, and perhaps provide a few examples? What IS "pressure" for you, and how do you apply it. Is it a spatial concept, where you are controlling the dog's space (such as moving into the dog's space, or away from the dog's space as needed), or is it a physical concept, where you are physically applying pressure to the dog? I'm interested in learning more about this concept if you have time to share. [:)]


    Oh, me oh my oh. One could write books about the concept of pressure as it applies to herding. I'm sure Becca will have a different perspective than I do, and if you asked this question at a sheepdog trial you would probably pass out from exhaustion before everybody stopped blathering on about the concept. So, as a starting point, I'll offer the following analogy, which is not my own, but one I picked up from some instructor somewhere. Picture yourself trying to wash clods of dirt out of your driveway using a garden hose. Some of those clods of dirt might be big clumps of sod that are heavy and held together with lots of roots. In order to move those you are need to have the hose turned on full blast, and you'll probably have to have the nozzle pretty close to the clod. Some of those clumps of dirt might be loose clumps of sand. Turn the full spray nozzle on them at close range and they will just fall apart into a disorganized mass. So, when the dog is moving sheep (or cattle or poultry) sometimes he has to apply a lot of pressure just to get any movement at all. On the other hand, some livestock are like the sandy clump of soil - the dog needs to be far back applying just a trickle of pressure, and has to be constantly alert to the possibility that the clump is about to dissolve and constantly be ready to reduce the pressure or change the angle of approach by tiny amounts. And, the same set of stock can change from a clump of sod to a pile of sand back to a clump of sod depending on all kinds of outside circumstances, so the dog has to learn to recognize what he's working with and adjust his "spray" accordingly.

    But wait! There's more!

    It's not just a matter of the dog applying pressure to stock. You have three players - handler, dog, and stock - and they are each applying pressure to the other two. If I'm trying to move sheep into a trailer, depending on the stock, I might stand by the door to apply pressure from one side, while the dog applies pressure behind, to "squeeze" the sheep into the opening. Sometimes my pressure can be too great (or the dog's not enough) and I may have to move a bit back from the side of the trailer to keep from "squirting" the sheep off to the side of the door. I've seen dogs approach sheep to take them out of a pen and suddenly stop as if they hit a wall. In those close quarters the sheep were exerting more pressure on the dog than he was able to penetrate. Sometimes the handler can shift position so their combined pressure is enough to move the sheep out. Sometimes that can be a pretty tough situation with the dog and stock you have at that time. So, moving stock is always about balancing the pressures that three entities are each applying to the other two.

    And then there is the pressure the handler exerts on the dog, which I think was your real question. An inexperienced dog usually does not know yet how to measure his own pressure on sheep, or accurately read how much pressure he needs to apply. Usually, his initial contacts are too close. If the sheep are like our pile of sand, the flock will break apart and you have sheep running in many different directions which can really stimulate some dogs, and result in all kinds of chasing and chaos. I don't mean to make herding sound like some terrible war zone of dog, sheep and person, but this can be dangerous, and this is why you can't just wait for the dog to offer a better behavior and reward that. Handlers can get hit by sheep and be injured. Sheep can charge fences and break limbs and necks. Dogs can get in corners with sheep and be stomped. In my experience, dogs biting stock is the least of my worries - although bad bites can happen, it's the running into things that is most likely to cause injury. So, smart handlers don't start their dogs on clumps of sand, but pick some nice big ol' pieces of sod to start training their dog with. And now, to help the dog feel how to apply appropriate pressure on the stock, it's the handler's job to apply enough pressure on the dog so that the dog can feel how to move that clump of sod without causing it to bust up, and ideally without rolling it over the top of the handler. The nature of that pressure depends on the dog and the handler and what they each had for breakfast that morning and the wind direction and the phase of the moon and ... In some cases, it might be the handler nearly whispering "ah ah" and pulling the sheep with her and away from the dog just enough to create the space the dog needs. In some cases, it might be a more forceful tone of voice. Or a flick of a hand. Or waving a pole. Or waving a pole with something flappy on the end of it. Or slapping a hat against a leg. Or rattling a bottle with a couple rocks in it. Or slapping a pole on the ground. Or lobbing a short piece of hose in the general direction of the dog. There a gazillion things out there that various trainers have used at various times, but the idea is to apply enough pressure to the dog, and give him enough room to get out, and draw the sheep enough in one direction that the dog gets to feel that magical spot where the clump of dirt is tumbling away from him in a nice calm cohesive unit. Then, just about the time you and the dog start to feel comfortable shoving clumps of sod around, you start introducing him to lighter more delicate clumps. One of the hallmarks of a talented dog is that with experience they will begin to feel for themselves how much pressure to apply to a given clump, and ultimately be far better at judging this than the handler is. But when the dog misjudges, as they all do do sometimes, and starts to break up the clump, it's far more likely that he's going to regress to chasing unless the handler applies enough pressure to help him get back where he needs to be.

    Teaching the dog the few commands associated with herding is a relatively trivial component of training. An experienced handler and a talented dog can do a respectable job of moving reasonably cooperative stock around without the dog knowing a single command just by the handler knowing when and where to apply pressure to the dog. What is needed is first and foremost a dog with the genetic programing that causes his little brain to become awash with endorphins when he is control of his stock, and enough sensitivity to pressure that he learns to respond to the pressure of the handler, and eventually to feel the pressure of the stock and feel how to push on that particular clump of dirt at that particular moment. The trainer's job is to set situations up and apply just enough pressure to help the dog get to where he needs to be to experience the joy of having control of his stock.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I apologize if I'm not very coherant. I'm a bit brain dead after spending the afternoon and part of this evening at the e-vet with a rescue who went into seizrues this afternoon. He's stable but we still don't know what was causing them, so I'm pretty worried on top of being emotionally and phsically drained. But I'm too wound up to sleep, so here I am . . .[8|]

    Anyway, busterTSD has covered much of the general territory. "Pressure" in my way of thinking, is exactly what "P" would mean in an operant sense - something that would tend to inhibit the dog's behavior.

    Very, very few respected trainers actually do anything that contacts the dog, these days. Well, except for when the dog is endangering the sheep. Physical pressure, for most purposes in this discussion, means "not verbal."

    One of the things that has been a huge revelation to me when transitioning from strictly companion and sport dog training, to training to work livestock, is the importance of assessing all posssible sources of pressure when introducing a new concept. It applies to both working livestock and training non-working dogs, but it's something you deal with more in working with livestock because you can shut off ALL pressure from you, and the dog's still got to deal with things you can't control 100% like what the livestock are doing, and the effect of the training environment - other livestock calling their friends, a gate in an inconvenient place, spooky shadows the stock don't want to cross, the fact that sheep want to go downhill in the morning and uphill at night, inclement weather.

    The last two pups I've trained learned first thing to respond to a verbal correction. I've only raised Border Collie puppies and one litter of rescue lab mix puppies, so I don't know how widely applicable this would be to, say, a Boxer puppy. But I do a lot of walking with the pups right from the start, and they learn to follow. If they don't, I'll say HEY, and call their name really sweetly when they make some kind of signal that they heard me. If they just completely blow me off, I'll walk Pup down and give him a little scruff. They might need a couple of those, and then after that the voice correction is sufficient.

    After that it depends on the dog, the situation you are dealing with, and how well the dog learned their early lessons. I did a whole lot of work with Rocky, my older pup, than with Ted, my younger pup, so I can walk out with Rocky and pretty much never make a move in his direction. He takes very gentle voice corrections as well as my older dog Cord. Actually, he responds much better because Cord is still recovering from being pushed too hard, too fast as a younger dog, and gets nervous if I need to speak to him more firmly.

    Ted, um, is a lot more enthusiastic, plus I wasn't as faithful with his early training as I was with Rocky. He hit adolescence right when I had a lot of other stuff going on, unfortunately. He's also a little trickier to handle - if I give him a correction I've got to be sure to follow up with a TON of freedom and an invitation to come right back. Ted gets some corrections that are more physical, which I'll describe next.

    What happens, ideally, is that Ted should leave my feet, go around the sheep, stop at the point where the sheep's heads all turn away from him and towards me (balance) and then start moving them straight to me. In our minds, it all looks like motion in space, but to the sheep and the dog, it's the give and take of physical forces, a game of mental chess, cat-and-mouse. I think of it sometimes like the hawk riding the currents above us - we see nothing but the hawk flying in circles, while the hawk's brain is being bombarded with information about the air that's keeping him afloat.

    A pup is developing these senses, but he doesn't know what to do about them. Like a seven year old kid has all the mental capacity and physcal senses need to read, but needs some schooling and a ton of practice to become competant.

    Unfortunately, sheep are not books - they don't sit nicely and wait for the dog to learn how to read them. And we can't tell the dog how to learn that either - we have no idea, not even the most talented trainer, of what exactly a dog needs to do at any one moment to control livestock.

    So the dog has to be encouraged to experiment. But he also needs a way to learn that some "experiments" are unacceptable. The good stuff, the stuff that feels wonderful and right to a well-bred herding dog, doesn't happen right away - the dog has to go through some stages that aren't quite right.

    So, we step the dog through those stages. We try as much as possible to make what's right, easy, by doing things like working in a small space and using sheep that are very forgiving. Then we step in with corrections to help the dog learn more precise control while it's still easy - kind of like making the training wheels on the bike uneven so that if your child rides straight he's actually balancing on two wheels and can get the feel of it.

    So I send Ted and he blows into the middle instead of going around. He does it every stinking time, the first time I let him go. I finally figured out this weekend why - he's not really feeling the sheep right yet. I thought he was, but he isn't.

    So what I'll do this week is first work on getting him to the other side, any which way, and then once he's settled the sheep on the other side, we'll walk the sheep around and do little turns. If I turn so that he's got to go between the sheep and the fence, he either does it right, making a nice arc around the very edge of the ring, or he'll drop his shoulder and start to dive.

    If it were Rocky, I'd just say, "EH!" or speak his name, and Rocky would bounce back out like he'd hit a wall. Ted, on the other hand, if I spoke would say to himself, "She's not really serious" and dive anyway. By diving, I mean, come in and bite, so we're talking injury to sheep here. Also, potentially, me, Ted, and anyone standing nearby if the sheep crashes the fence in a pnaic and runs someone down.

    So, for some reason, that first time, Ted needs to have a stick thrown at him when I see that shoulder drop. It's a light fiberglass stock stick, and the idee is to drop it behind him and startle him.

    At the same time, I BACK UP - anytime I put pressure on the dog, I relieve it immediately - plus backing up gives the sheep somewhere to go, giving the dog room - becuase he made things all hot and bothered in the space where he is now. I also have some other physcial corrections that sometimes work if all the stars are in alignment. I can raise my hands to the side or over my head. I click my fingers to block a side - which is sort of a weird audible/physical correction hybrid, I guess. I can push on, into, or tap the sheep to split them up and get the dog's attention. Last but not least, for a dog that's just plain not listening, I will step forward with a quick sweep of my crook or stick until the dog says, "Whoa!" and then back up again really quick.

    None of this is to punish (in the ethical sense), teach a lesson, make a connection, or even entirely stop the behavior all at once. It's just to create a moment where the dog remembers I exist so he can think again about what he's doing. P+ to extinguish what he was doing at that second, but then he's got the hugest self-reinforcing smorgasborg right in front of him, so he doesn't mind as long as I get out of the way quickly and let him try again. Soon he learns that no matter what, P+ just means, "Try again," not, "You suck. Just give up."

    Once I get Ted's attention those first couple of passes, I can just use verbal corrections again. If my timing is right, I can keep going down the scale until I'm working with just suggestions of corrections. I can do this with Rocky. Not quite there with Ted - he's just so darned fast. I'll get there, though - we were almost together this weekend before I pooped out.[:D]

    Ideally, if you correct the dog while he's thinking about something, rather than when he's in the middle of it or even when he's starting to do it, the dog can correct himself. This is an excellent thing for a dog to learn, because a lot of times there will be situations where the dog will start to do something, and if he's learned to be flexible and "give" to pressure, he'll self correct.

    For instance, our large field has a small "pan-handle" which extends up one side, behind a tree line. Sometimes some of the sheep will go back there to graze. Cord had to learn, mechanically, through our guidance, that he's supposed to look for sheep up there. He doesn't self-correct, so if he starts in that direction, he'll take the whole trip up into that corner before coming back down and getting the rest of the sheep.

    Gus, on the other hand, never had to be taught to look back there. The first time he saw that corner, he widened out until he could see there weren't sheep back there, and then cut back down into the main field. Conversely, when there are sheep back there, he maneuvers correctly in order not to miss any that might be in the woods or the very back corner.

    Both of these dogs have to do this without our help because the corner is a couple hundred yards away, is out of our sight, pretty much, and there's a big dead spot for sound right in front.

    I think I've wandered a bit off the main topic. Most of what I've seen in terms of fair physical pressure in a training situation is the "sweeping" that a lot fo trainers use, that I'm not a huge fan of myself - in this you get a paddle, a rake with soft tines (kiddie leaf rakes), a stock stick, or a pvc pipe, and you position yourself like you are the hand of a clock with the sheep in the middle and the dog running around the numbers. The stick thing would prevent the dog from getting to the sheep, encouraging the dg to run in a circle instead of straight at them. Some people sort of sweep at the dog, some just point it, some touch the ground in front of the dog.

    The reason I'm not a huge fan of this is that it actually just makes the dog go in the right place, but never teaches him to feel out the pressure from the stock. It tends to make dogs that can't find sheep (or geese) in the big areas I work in.

    A similiar thing is what I call the "golf swing" approach. You position yourself, again, between the sheep and the dog and start the dog around the sheep, swinging at the dog as he goes by, to push him out. Lots of really, really, top notch trainers start dogs this way. Again, not really a fan - super enthusiastic dogs tend to sneak around the top of the swing and flatten out at the top of the curve, behind the sheep. Then you have to teach the dog not to come in close at the top, either.

    A couple of overseas trainers (and some here now, too) use long lines to settle the dog behind the sheep. The pressure on the rope comes off when the dog chooses to settle. These trainers often teach the dog to move the sheep away from them, first - even Border Collies. There's a couple of trainers who I respect very much who do this and they are revolutionizing the way people have assumed Border Collies "had" to be trained. I like them for that though, again, I'm not a huge fan of the rope thing.

    Ron, Laura (dogslyfe) and mrv (I apologize, fried brain, can't remembe whether you go by your real name or not) also work their dogs on stock. Laura's got sheep - can't remember whether mrv does.
    • Gold Top Dog
    I think an interesting question would be how many people actually work dogs. Some have dogs that are into agility trials but are also companion dogs. I can think of three people with dogs that work cattle. Spiritdogs, Brookscove, and Buster the Show Dog.


    I work my dogs on stock - sheep quite specifically at the moment. I do have my own sheep. I don't chime in much in these conversations simply because Becca says things much better than I do, and I'm not so good at debate. I happen to know quite a few folks that work their dogs on stock.

    I also use aversives in my training - dependent on it being appropriate for the situation and the dog.

    For a change I'm going to tell you guys a story. June came to me just two years ago... a dog that was turned off of stock. Shut down, if you will. She decided for some reason that maybe she would possibly consider looking at stock again when she came to me. So, we started taking lessons together... but I was constantly in fear of doing something to shut her down again.

    I've more or less tiptoed around her, and truly she wouldn't take much pressure from anyone but me. I had serious doubts as to her usefulness as a stockdog. I've lived with the fear that a real correction from me might turn her off again. Then one day I brought home our own sheep.

    Not too long ago we were sorting our ewes and lambs out from the wethers they shared pasture with - with the intent of working my young dog on them. June had a brainless moment, got excited, and decided to bust apart my ewes and their lambs, and maybe have a little chase. I saw it coming, and forgot myself - and gave her a whammy of a correction (verbal). Surprisingly enough, she looked at me as if to say, "Well, why didn't you say so??"... and at that moment she settled.

    I could literally in that moment see her confidence just growing. She had come to the conclusion that I *was* in control, and would tell her when she was wrong. She didn't quit - she actually settled down and started handling the stock as if she knew what she was doing. She began to think. That was all I really wanted from her - for her to think.

    It was a real eye opening moment for June and I both. Becca can personally attest to the change in this dog... she's seen it with her own eyes. Part of the change was due to having our own stock with real jobs the do, and the other part has been me changing - understanding more of what she needs when.

    This dog needed to be told she was wrong in this situation. I didn't have to beat her over the head with anything... and all I did was literally say to her, "HEY! What are you doing?". She said back to me, "What?". She then flanked around, regathered the sheep, and then quietly brought them to me as I gave her the room to do so. I gave her the opportunity to choose to be right - I changed my body position and gave her room to go where she needed to be. As she came right, I talked to her in a very kind voice. I later set her up in the same situation again, and she quietly went around and scooped them out of the corner with a big goofy grin on her face. She had given me the whole answer, and she was happy to do so. All I was looking for was a response, but she gave me the whole enchilada.

    Training dogs to work stock isn't about alpha rolls, leash pops, or beating dogs. It shouldn't be, IMO. Training a dog has more to do with giving the dog what it needs - appropriately for that situation and that dog. June's never going to be a superstar. But I'll tell you all this - she's a better dog today, and I'm a better handler today. We're learning together.

    That's all.




    • Gold Top Dog
    This dog needed to be told she was wrong in this situation. I didn't have to beat her over the head with anything... and all I did was literally say to her, "HEY! What are you doing?". She said back to me, "What?". She then flanked around, regathered the sheep, and then quietly brought them to me as I gave her the room to do so. I gave her the opportunity to choose to be right - I changed my body position and gave her room to go where she needed to be. As she came right, I talked to her in a very kind voice. I later set her up in the same situation again, and she quietly went around and scooped them out of the corner with a big goofy grin on her face. She had given me the whole answer, and she was happy to do so. All I was looking for was a response, but she gave me the whole enchilada.


    [sm=dance.gif][sm=bravo.gif]

    And yes, I did notice - June just gets better and better!