Deb
Posted : 10/7/2006 3:19:26 PM
Brian Kilcommons is a great traditional trainer, so are the monks of new skete.
The interesting thing about these trainers is that they minimize correction and work to correct precisely, with finesse.
I don't think CM intends this, but the effect of his television show on others is amazing because it aggrandizes the correction or show of force, and makes dominance much more important than working with the dog.
I think this is cultural, I think it's about the nature of television and the nature of America right now. But the way it is making arguments erupt over what used to be non-issues on the behavior forum is really fascinating.
Ten or fifteen years ago, clicker training was only for dolphins and nobody knew anything about +R or -P or whatever... but most training methods emphasized setting the dog up to succeed, minimizing correction, making sure the correction doesn't look like it comes from you, etc.
These are all positive reinforcement ideas--you want your dog to trust you, you want your dog to understand you, you want training to be fun.
I think that most people who use traditional methods use positive reinforcement all the time. And for that matter, every time I get impatient and jerk my dog away from something instead of practicing "leave it," I am administering a correction.
In reality we all seem to be on the same team, roughly. And yet these absurd arguments are happening, complete with value judgements and name calling, and I think that is a function of CM's celebrity, and his macho, and the way he uses force to make good television.
Dog training should never look good on television.