Danny
Posted : 3/17/2006 3:31:14 PM
Hello there [

]
I think I have said what I needed to say on this topic (someone might actually bother one day to either read some of the references given, or even better, make sure that whenever he or she uses a crate, it is only done when it is unavoidable and not just convenient - then it was worth the effort already), so just a few last comments to tie up lose ends will have to do (well, unless someone comes up with another argument than "but its not possible in RL" - while I know it is).
Mic, I think we agree on the basics: "The majority of dog owners probably shouldn't have dogs, but they are going to continue to." Where we differ is in how we approach such people. That is quite alright. As I stated in a previous post, ten dog trainers often will have ten different opinions on any given subject. [

]
The science, as it is science taken from 'real life', of course highly matters in this instance. Therefore I stand by my argument that less crating would be a good thing (I am not saying "no crating") and why it would be a good thing. I also stand by my assertion that it is very well possible.
As you ask about my background, let me just say that I hold a number of academic degrees in related fields. The experience and knowledge gained there helps me to swiftly get to scientific resources - for one thing because I might have read them beforehand (I started my education with a master in zoology, where I had for the first time the opportunity to study canids extensively), for another, because there are search programs that help you to quickly find the articles you need on any given subject. Then it is just a matter of quickly looking them up for relevance and data. I also, besides pursuing my academic career and training my own dogs, do train and counsel people with dogs (deliberately worded this way [

] ), try to contribute to the continued education of established trainers, do some non-profit work, and so forth. I think this gives me a vantage point from where I can see both sides of the coin, which I find particularly important (another issue where we agree I would guess from the manner of your question).
You are saying "I can't imagine leaving my 8 dogs loose in my house while I am at work. That is the craziest thing I have ever heard." Well, I am not sure where you heard that from, but I am quite sure not from me. [

] First off, there are very few people in the general dog owning population owning 8 dogs. So I do not think you can compare yourself with others here, nor do I think I was talking at any point about 8-dog households. All I said is that one should not regularly have dogs holed up 16h a day in a crate. I cannot seriously believe you think differently there. Furthermore, having one or two dogs (as most people do), it is very well possible to train them to behave just fine without being crated while one is out at work. If you do not believe that, you just come visit and I will show you. [

]
As to agilebcs, I do not this quasi-ad-hominem style of discussion is very conductive to progress. If someone likes to sit in a motte-and-bailey castle of preconceived notions from which nothing will dislodge or challenge their comfortable self, then that is their choice and I could not care any less.
There is no reason however to demean others who dare to disagree. Nobody says that you are not entitled to your opinion, and yes indeed, your postings (at least in this thread) do show "bad form". That is quite alright also, but do not hope for anyone taking you serious this way - which might be a pity, because I believe that every person has something of value to add, and for that it does not need agreement in any other way than that of treating one another with some basic respect. Put differently, one will take Mic's (or Glenmar's )objections seriously - even though one's view might not jibe with them - precisely because they present them for the most part in a disengaged and not disparaging manner. If you tell someone that what he says is "babble", then that might satisfy your psychological makeup, but that particular discussion - where discussion means an earnest conversation - ends right there.
Glenmar, this is admittedly a conundrum. On the one hand, I can see your point. On the other, the crate is a jail. If the fire starts in the room with the crates, or underneath it, there is no way for the dogs to get away from it to temporary safety. Now do not get me wrong. I am not saying that you are false. I am saying that you have a valid objection that is, given that there are also circumstances where the crate could be a malus, not quite as clearcut, but certainly worth taking note off.
In that sense, my thank to Mic and Glenmar for the shared thoughts. [

]