Danny
Posted : 3/12/2006 12:17:07 AM
Hello Roxanne
Let me share a few thoughts and experiences on that topic.
Teaching a puppy to give a signal to go outside is a common, but questionable, house training practice. While appearing reasonable and useful at first glance, encouraging dogs to give such a signal may conflict with the objective of training them to hold and eliminate in accordance with an arbitrary schedule. One major aspect of all training is impulse control, something bell-training is quite the opposite to.
One should not forget that need-to-go-signals depend on the owner being present to respond - a state of affairs that care rarely be maintained on a consistent basis. An all too common unfortunate outcome of such training is the development of elimination problems later. Unable to get the owner's attention with the elimination signal, a dog often times simply proceeds to eliminate somewhere it ought not to, thereby reflecting the previously established pattern in association with the need-to-go signal (give a signal, then eliminate).
Furthermore, many dogs rapidly or over time learn to extend the signal into a oh-this-gets-me-outside! signal, prompting the now well trained owner to go outside for purposes other than the dog's elimination.
While it might be cute and fun, this is not something you should pursue training. Have the dog on a age and health appropriate elimination schedule. That will ensure that there are no accidents after the proper training has been conducted, with the added value of the dog having to control and regulate its impulses.
I would suggest to you to train your dog something else but very much related: train it to eliminate on cue. This is easier as it sounds, and puts you in command - not the dog - and I am sure it will make at least as great an impression on anyone witnessing it (in fact, on anyone having some idea about dog training, much more so).
Have a great weekend and my best wishes to you and your pup. [

]