Chuffy
Posted : 4/16/2007 12:04:04 PM
ORIGINAL: jenhuedepohl
How'd this get so off track? I was just trying to recommend a book that didn't say leadership techniques were abusive and 20 years out of date.
I can comment, but it was a long time ago so don't quote me....
Firstly, the gesture eating: I don't recall it being so "flaky" as that - the technique described in the earlier post did sound a bit silly. I don't remember it being explained like that at all, but I could be wrong. I *do* remember that it emphasised that the process should be matter of fact, involving the whole household if possible and it was important not to tease the dog. That description really doesn't fit in with those at all, so maybe I need to get hold of it and re-read it.....
Secondly, the suspending the walk. Not sure if you mean that she recommended not walking at all while you "bond" or suspending the walk if the dog misbehaved, but I've done both. I did give her method a try, the latter I had tried already with some success, but the former I was VERY skeptical about. It worked! I have since read other things that explained about stress hormones and what not and I am now sure that, while suspending the walk was a good thing for us, it was not necessarily for the reasons she describes.... perhaps it works on a number of levels, so that she is not wrong, but that there is more to it than she explains in the book? Anyway, it worked.
I was skeptical about the whole thing really, especially because she flashes the D-word round quite a lot.... but I was impressed because while she believes many if not all problems relate back to the "pack structure", her way of taking back the reins was so..... passive? Non violent and non threatening, no conflict, no scruffing or pinning, no rolling, no taking the food dish away, no staring out, no shouting or smacking or punitive devices.... And her emphasis on calm was an epiphany for me. Those were the things that stuck in my mind the most.
If I have a personality flaw (and I am sure I have several) it is my tendancy to over-analyse and I did find the book made me do that A LOT. Having said that, several books have had that effect on me, so I think the fault is with me there, not the book or the method.