How would a....???

Gina, and everyone else,
 
what my point was and is is that no matter how philosophies differ we all have common ground.   We share in common different techniques all employed for the same cause; to have dogs that behave according to our rules.
 
Any pretense to baiting was only on the side of the observers, none was intended.  There are those, especially in this section that feel free to bash others for their beliefs and methods-using snide remarks and off handed comments.  If I can have a heated debate over some extreme issues without snide comments or off handed remarks then I think the same can be done here in this section. 
 
So remember folks, whether you adhere to the principles taught by CM or Leerburg, Clothier or whomever you'd name as your "favorite" trainer, we all have in common the same goals and ends. 
 
If this is interpreted as baiting then some of you have alot to learn about discourse.

whether you adhere to the principles taught by CM or Leerburg, Clothier or whomever you'd name as your "favorite" trainer, we all have in common the same goals and ends.

What if we "adhere" to parts of *all* of them [] (I wonder how much duct tape would take?...)

Sorry. Couldn't resist! [8D] I'm just tired of the all-or-nothing approach to dog training philosophies. I'm a CM fan with a clicker. I don't fit in the round hole OR the square hole. Maybe I'm an oval or a rounded rectangle?

ORIGINAL: Xerxes

So remember folks, whether you adhere to the principles taught by CM or Leerburg, Clothier or whomever you'd name as your "favorite" trainer, we all have in common the same goals and ends. 

And thats why i would do it exactly as you would, there is no difference if i'm a CM supporter, Leerburg supporter, Bush supporter, American Idol supporter, none of them are focused on that part of the dog's trainig

Is like asking how a Colombian person would tie his shoes? well just like any other person in this world would, as easy as that []

(i hope it does not sounds rude because was not intended)

ORIGINAL: espencer

ORIGINAL: Xerxes

So remember folks, whether you adhere to the principles taught by CM or Leerburg, Clothier or whomever you'd name as your "favorite" trainer, we all have in common the same goals and ends. 

And thats why i would do it exactly as you would, there is no difference if i'm a CM supporter, Leerburg supporter, Bush supporter, American Idol supporter, none of them are focused on that part of the dog's trainig

Is like asking how a Colombian person would tie his shoes? well just like any other person in this world would, as easy as that []

(i hope it does not sounds rude because was not intended)

 
I certainly support American Idol more than Bush. []

I certainly support American Idol more than Bush.

 
That's because you are in Canada, and there is nothing better going on than "American Idol"[][]

ORIGINAL: Scout in Canada

I certainly support American Idol more than Bush. []

Ditto, i support more: American Idol, my wife, my dog, my family, my friends, my neighbors, my co workers, my counrty men and women, my car, my house, my grandma's shoes, the tree in the next street, the grass, the blue sky, the rocks, the planet, [size="1"]the sun, the moon, the ufo's and go on, and on, and on..................[/size]

ORIGINAL: Xerxes

 (yes they are closely associated because of their philosophies)

Really? leerburg (and I'm only stating what he himself said on his own site) hangs dogs, how is that "closely associated philosophies"?

So you're not a Bush supporter then? []

snickersnort.  That was my next question.

I think this is tease Espence day.

ORIGINAL: Chuffy

So you're not a Bush supporter then? []

ORIGINAL: Awsomedog

ORIGINAL: Xerxes

(yes they are closely associated because of their philosophies)

Really? leerburg (and I'm only stating what he himself said on his own site) hangs dogs, how is that "closely associated philosophies"?

 
How is that in any way different than what CM did to the Jindo?

ORIGINAL: Xerxes

Gina, and everyone else,

what my point was and is is that no matter how philosophies differ we all have common ground.   We share in common different techniques all employed for the same cause; to have dogs that behave according to our rules.

Then why not just say that, and leave it at that?

Any pretense to baiting was only on the side of the observers, none was intended.  There are those, especially in this section that feel free to bash others for their beliefs and methods-using snide remarks and off handed comments.  If I can have a heated debate over some extreme issues without snide comments or off handed remarks then I think the same can be done here in this section.

I didn't really care why you asked the question, and thought I'd answer it, but perhaps the others are on to something. The negative undertones of that statement have me wondering. "There are those, especially in this section" sounds like finger pointing to me. And as someone else stated, that highway travels both directions.

So remember folks, whether you adhere to the principles taught by CM or Leerburg, Clothier or whomever you'd name as your "favorite" trainer, we all have in common the same goals and ends.

Again, you could have just said that, so then, what's there left to say? Instead you expected what? Us to understand your hidden meaning to the question? Because actually I'm not sure what your meaning has to do with the question now.

If this is interpreted as baiting then some of you have alot to learn about discourse.

Whatever, you asked, I answered. Done.

How is that in any way different than what CM did to the Jindo?

 
Ed, come on, Frawley hangs super aggressive dogs 'til they pass out........the Jindo deal was nothing like that, not even a hanging.....[]

ORIGINAL: Xerxes


How is that in any way different than what CM did to the Jindo?

Here we go, you obviously never had a dog on leash try to attack you, there are few ways to stop them. Cesar did it brought the dog off his *two* front feet to stop a attack, he doesn't use it as a training tool... See the difference now?

ORIGINAL: snownose

How is that in any way different than what CM did to the Jindo?

Ed, come on, Frawley hangs super aggressive dogs 'til they pass out........the Jindo deal was nothing like that, not even a hanging.....[]

A post from someone who did their home work and NOT someone just throwing half truths around. Good job snownose.

Xerxes, now I am seeing what the others meant about the entent of your post.

[sm=eek.gif]WOW ..I am utterly appalled at the lack of compassion that some people on this thread seem to have.  If you don#%92t like the question or the way it was phrased then don#%92t bother answering it….  Instead you chose to attack the OP, who btw if you ever really bothered to get to know you would find that the things you are accusing him of are totally NOT in his character.  But instead of listening to someone or actually getting to know one another you continue to insult people that you don#%92t agree with their opinions or philosophies and then pat those with likeminded thinking on the back.
 
You push people WAY Too far and then wonder why they chose to attack back and frankly it is disgusting behavior to me. Perhaps some of you need a lesion in compassion and kindess.