Awsomedog
Posted : 1/16/2007 4:36:57 PM
Remove humans from the lives of dogs and before you know it, you have dogs being dogs. Dogs need a life the same as humans, they should have their needs as dogs met the same as humans do. The difference is, while humans have no "keepers" we are our dogs keepers. Their lives are controlled by us, and that's simply stating the facts. When we bring dogs into our lives we should be prepared to do what it takes to raise them happy and healthy. Sometimes that means doing what's best for them and not what makes us emotionally happy. Without humans, dogs grow up, become responsible members of a pack. Some hunt, some watch the young, and the young play and wait. There is purpose, and there is a pack leader. The pack leader is the keeper, he/she will lead, keep order, impose his or her will, and do what's best for the pack. Dogs in the wild and some in domesticted packs will harshly correct each other (and instead of becoming unreasonably fearful or aggressive towards the corrector, will simply submit) then turn right around and lick each other five minutes later. Dogs without humans also walk great distances, (could be the reason they have four legs) walking allows them learn about their environment. And since observation is one of the main ways a dog learns, walks seem to serve many purposes. Walks help the dog to deal with not only physical but mental stimulation. Do I pet my dog on the head when she walks up to me in the morning? Sure I do, then we hit the trail. Do I mind if she sniffs around? Not once we've come to a stopping point. I know of no dog that "needs" to sniff every single spot when every other dog has peed or pooped. Have the dog walk with me and keep his/her head up helps to keep the dogs mind moving forward, and not just be obsessed with the next pee or poop smell. My dogs love their walks, two miles out, stop and play, two miles back. It's a good time. I have rules, I give a correction only when needed, NILIF is the order, and love on them and give effection for being good dogs. Why in the world would anyone have a problem with that. And as a professional, the dogs I see, meet and work with that have issues are the ones that get non or the opposite of that. Sure some people get very lucky and happen to get a naturally happy go lucky dog (that's why some people believe R+ only training works, these are the only dogs they've dealt with.) but most people don't. Why do you think their are sooo many problem dogs.
Dogs are not human, they do not feel, think, like humans. Ever known a dog to lie? They certainly do not wish they were human, and to think they do is an insult to them.
When Cesar "suggest" one should go about dealing with their dogs a certain way, that's what it is, a suggestion. He's going by what he has learned over *years* of studying and working with dogs. His advise is most definitely helpful to those who have out of control dogs, and while we may differ on somethings, I've not seen him give anyone harmful or bad "advise". And advise is something one can follow, or ignore.