Ratsicles
Posted : 7/18/2007 1:07:53 PM
IMO, everyone's situation is different. As others have said, there in differences in what people are able to handle.
If we're talking about PET dogs, I personally would not add a puppy to the situation if one of the dogs in the home were aggressive. That's just me.
If we're talking about WORKING dogs, that depends on the situation. A flock guardian dog, which is what I have, does not need the same amount of attention as a pet, or some other types of working dogs. Very little real "Training" is necessary, and contact with the puppy beyond necesseties MUST be kept to a minimum to ensure that the puppy bonds with the flock, rather than his human caretakers.
Waiting to get a LGD would have meant that my livestock would have been exposed to predators for an even longer period of time. I guess you have to live on a farm to understand- not being able to keep your animals from being killed by wild animals is a scary thing. I chose to go ahead and find a way to protect my livestock in the best way possible- with a dog bred specifically for the purpose.
As for the puppy taking time away from the aggressive dog? Not an issue here, since I'm not supposed to be spending much time with this puppy anyway, so that isn't an issue.
So in my situation, I think that what I did was a good decision. I needed a working dog to protect my livestock and I got one, and I do not regret that. IMO, as long as the puppy is not taking time away from addressing the problem, and as long as it is not exacerbating the problem, it's fine. People know what they can handle, and as long as they are well aware of their limits, only they can decide what's right or wrong for their situation.