spiritdogs
Posted : 5/14/2006 10:40:47 AM
I think before we "agree to disagree", it's perhaps something that all trainers can commit to - that some dogs are more sensitive than others, hence the need to be judicious in choosing any training method.
Doberman owners, for example, often cite the sensitivity of that breed - even the slightest indication that their human is upset can make quite a few of them cringe as though, as one poster on another thread put it, you were "ripping their heart out with a spoon". Conversely, a lot of Labs will just look at you puzzled, and not really care that you dropped six hundred penny cans on the floor - they just think it's raining toys.
[sm=clapping%20hands%20smiley.gif]
The herders can be a bit more sensitive to clatter. Of course, that is not to say they all will. Just that you have to know your breed's propensities and your individual dog's temperament to assess that. This is often difficult for new or relatively inexperienced owners, and the truth of the matter is that they get into less trouble, and trouble that is more easily fixed, when they employ non-aversive training methods.
Experienced trainers can invoke a non-harmful leash pop, while novices often end up with a dog with a damaged larynx (Before I get mail, I'm not recommending choke collars, just citing this as an example). So, to me, the prudent choice for beginners is not necessarily what a more advanced trainer might choose as a method.
I am always intrigued, though, by the tenacity with which some folks hang on to aversives, even in the face of mounting evidence that a more progressive method works very well in most cases. Seems to me these people would have quite a lot of trouble if they were training lions rather than dogs. But, as I've often said here,
I don't have to live with anyone else's dog! [

]