nigguysmom
Posted : 3/16/2011 6:36:48 PM
I want to say thank you to everyone who responded to my post. I know that everyone has the very best interests of the animals, my boys and myself at heart, but I do feel like a few clarifications on my part are due.
1. I did say that I took over a business when in reality, what I did was to continue walking a group of dogs that was used to walking together and letting them join me on my daily walks with my dogs. My dogs were used to walking with the rest of dogs, so it was a good fit, my dogs get consistent solid exercise everyday, the other dogs would too and the owners are all comfortable with the group. As for professionalism, I don't really see any issues with the arrangements as all owners knew that they were having their dogs join me on my daily routine, not specifically a business to service only client dogs.
2. I do not have insurance, but Willowchow makes a very good point that I will look into. If anyone has any specific information on insurance I would be pleased to have it. I had not thought about it as I was only doing this walking as a favor to the owners who lost their original dog-walker.
3. Spiritdogs also makes and excellent point. Use of common sense. "Common sense dictates that if you have any "iffy" behavior, you NOT walk
those dogs together, even if it means losing business. And,
truthfully, you won't - what will happen is that word of mouth will
spread FAST that you sacrifice rather than put any of your client dogs in danger, and you will not lack for business!" This is more true than anyone can imagine, but I had come to the conclusion last night that I would be altering my route and the two dogs in question wouldn't be walking together any longer. I think that I was more in shock that it happened and I didn't know why that I still thought (and still do think) that they could walk peacefully together, but it would be just as easy to separate them than not. So, common sense of separating them is already a done deal.
4. Now please do not take this the wrong way, but my original post was rather lengthy and probably had more information needed, but I have noticed that in order to help, people request more rather than too little information. My original request really was for clarification on the behaviors of the dogs, specifically the face-rubbing as a trigger. Denise made the comment that "It actually doesn't matter 'why'. We are not dogs and as much as we like
to think we know why our dogs do what they do, most time it is an
educated guess at best." I agree partially with that. I do believe that the "why" does matter as it may have some influence on other behaviors. I also agree whole-heartedly that most of what we really know is an educated guess at best, but that was what I was seeking from people on the forum.
5. So, again, please do not take my last point negatively, but my was a request for information and it was not truly acknowledged except to imply it wasn't important. I will check out the book that JackieG referred me to and the DVD's that Spiritdogs suggested, and I hear and understand what everyone has said about separating the two dogs and have already decided that it is the solution that will work for me. But please, I am asking for help in finding good solid resources to be able to continue enjoying my walks, not looking for people to tell me everything that they think I am doing wrong. Disagreement is a wonderful thing when it is presented as a way to learn about others, but not when it is presented as the only opinion or way of doing things.
Thank you for listening/reading my posts.