ron2
Posted : 9/27/2010 6:41:42 PM
Thanks, Burl. The colloquial expression is "when you hear hoofbeats, you expect horses, not zebras."
The practicality of least hypothesis. The easiest, simplest explanation is often the most correct. Of course, not always. Maybe one in ten times, it is a zebra. But exceptions often reinforce the main rule or maxim.
A dog looks at the leash and harness, the door, and then at you. You, the human, (in this case, me) have a flash of insight and notice that these objects have to do with being outside. So, you get up and go to the back door and the dog happily goes out to pee, bark a few times, sniff some scents, whatever. Is that just a mindless automaton that stumbled upon a sequence that you, the human, interpreted in our dastardly "anthropromorphic" way, as a communication to go outside, when no such thing was happening? Okay. As we say here in Texas, even a blind hog finds an acorn once in a while. But the dog does it again the next time he wants to go out. And again. And again.
So, you (in this case, me), the human decide this is the dog's communication to go outside. Simple and easy answer. And someone comes along to say that the dog was not communication because he was not speaking in a southern accent of american english and that, instead, it is a tension to need to go outside and the release of peeing and whatever. That's okay for the blind hog in one instance. But what about the repetition of the "communication"?