A friend of mine asked my opinion on what she was feeding her dog (Beneful! Yikes!). I directed her to the dogfoodanalysis, and dog food project sites, and I told her that I was currently feeding Merrick. My girls are doing well on it. I do plan to continue the transition to raw though.
She got some Merrick for her girl (2 yr old Chihuahua) Abbey.
After 2 weeks, she went to her Banfield vet for a check-up. He told her that this food was far too high in calcium (she's feeding the puppy palate, I don't know why she didn't get an adult aimed kind), and that it was giving Abbey crystals in her urine. He then told her that she would have to be on Hill's science diet for life. Abbey had no symptoms. No discomfort while urinating, no straining.
It's my understanding that if a diet is balanced in phosphorus and magesium, then concerns about excess calcium are unfounded as the excess will be flushed from the system. Additionally, she'd only been 2 weeks on this food.
I feel like she should get a 2nd opinion.
Am I correct about the calcium? Is this Vet biased toward Hills? Should I reconsider the Merrick?
I would appreciate anyone's take on this diagnosis.