stanton
Posted : 12/22/2008 9:31:14 AM
papillon806
Just because the pet food industry considers anything 50# or higher a large breed doesn't mean that you need to treat your dog like one if it's at the cutoff. Falon is 56lbs but by no means a "large breed."
Easy easy....does it matter?
There is no harm in it if someone wants to chose to do so, even if one dog is not considered a large breed, there is no nutrient loss in chosing a large breed puppy food.
Obviously someone would be wasting their time searching for a good large breed food if the pup was only going to be in the 40# or mid-height range. But, if they've adopted a puppy that has large baseball size knee caps at 4 mnths old, I think it's a wise decision to feed for the *what if* he/she turns out to be a large breed.
Personally, with the Orijen large breed puppy food, there was no price difference in the food; with the Innova large breed puppy there was only a $3 dollar difference in food....big deal in the overall quality of life.
I chose to *stick* with the large breed idea based on River's height alone, he stands taller then most Golden Retrievers who are considered large-breed; if I recall correctly the whole idea behind the *large breed puppy foods* was to make sure they didn't *grow* too fast...does that not include height as well as weight?
Seriously, I'm asking cause I'm assuming so, but I honestly don't know.
But whether or not I needed to chose this route, in my mind, he's close enough, and I'm glad I did. He, at 7-8 mnths old, was having such a growth spurt, we had to take him to the vet twice because he was in pain, and he up and just took off height wise.