HoundMusic
Posted : 12/17/2008 3:38:39 PM
glenmar
The food that I feed is not grainfree in that it has a bit of OATMEAL. Used no doubt to bind the kibble without using higher glycemic ingredients.
Sorry about that, thought I saw somewhere you fed EVO ...
glenmar
Corn as second on the ingredient list tells me that it's the bulk of the food is CORN. If that's what you choose to feed, that's your choice. Since I have learned more about canine nutrition, I prefer not to feed mine a steady diet of corn. I wouldn't feed that to my children, why would I feed itto my dogs?
Well, I don't equate children or any humans with dogs, very different nutritional needs. However, I don't see a problem with eating corn myself, it's high in protein, B vitamins, lutein. As I mentioned, the feed is 38% carbs which would dictate that it's not grain based, otherwise we would see a much higher carbohydrate percentage. I also try not to judge a dog feed based solely on ingredients, and the feeds that give results for me are almost always the one with the "bland" plain ingredient lists. Corn is highly digestable, not inherently an allergen, I believe it's behind rice & dogs (the carnivores!) are more likely to be allergic to beef, chicken, egg. The fact is they can be allergic to ANY protein, but I am still of the belief that severe allergies are more based on genetics than diet. Now I'm not saying to throw ingredients out the window and feed Beneful or Mainstay, but there is a great deal of propoganda going around on the internet regarding the digestability and nutritional value of certain ingredients. And as I mentioned, I would rather feed corn than go with these grain free feeds that have a cal:phos ratio of 3.0:2.0 (EVO) when the recommended daily requirement should be not much more than 1.1:1.0 for most dogs. Yet, that is ignored, while other feeds with controlled phosphorous levels that have corn or by products are condemned. There has been a whole lot of hype surrounding ingredients over the years, and from my research, I have concluded most of it is bunk. Have fed everything from raw, to Dog Chow to numerous holistic foods and NEVER had good long term results with the holistic feeds ... or 100% raw. Guess that goes to show that not all diets are what they're cracked up to be on the internet, and one must go by results, not ingredients alone.