FussyPoodles
Posted : 8/18/2008 10:22:24 PM
jode88
I am not using the dry food but I have a case of canned and I am having great results. I wondering if anyone uses the dry?
As far as I'm aware, the B.G. cans are for supplemental feeding only ...? i.e. they're pure meat, nothing else - so not a standalone food.
Just wanted to clarify that in case of any misunderstandings.
I have got a bag of the dry (Chicken formula) but am not feeding it at the moment because it contains yeast and I'm testing for yeast intolerance.
However, my guys both like the flavor very much (it's rare for the two to agree on liking one particular kibble!). Whereas they detest the TOTW (go figure).
I didn't notice any problems when feeding the dry - poops looked normal.
The only thing I don't like about it (apart from being a Merrick's product ... but honestly, I try to judge each food on its own merits and on the available information these days) is that there's a lot of oil/fat sprayed on the outside. That's kinda outdated kibble manufacturing IMO.
Wellness manages to make their CORE kibble non-greasy/non-sticky and it still has a decent fat content.
I would also give the BG the thumbs-up on packaging; that's increasingly important to me, with concerns over plastics leaching toxins etc.
I know there haven't been a lot of enthusiastic comments so far about the dry BG - but from where I'm standing, it's a minor miracle:
- it pleases the finicky types
- no digestive upsets or loose stools
I can't see anything amiss with a combination of the BG kibble + some of the BG cans for toppers, if your dog likes the food and does well on it.