Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Pet Food Companies

    • Gold Top Dog

    Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Pet Food Companies

    Read the defendant list carefully Surprise

    Their claim is:

    "“Premium” Pet Food Marketed and Sold as “Complete and Balanced” Has Historically Contained Such Items as Euthanized Dogs and Cats, Restaurant Grease, Hair, Hooves, and Diseased Animals, and Other Inedible Garbage."


    [link]http://www.mflegal.com/petfoodlawsuit[/link]

     
    Defendants:

    MARS INC.,

    MARS PETCARE US, INC.,

    PROCTER AND GAMBLE CO.,

    THE IAMS CO.,

    COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY,

    HILL’S PET NUTRITION,

    DEL MONTE FOODS, CO.,

    NESTLÉ USA INC.,

    NESTLÉ

    PURINA PETCARE CO.,

    NUTRO PRODUCTS INC.,

    NATURA PET PRODUCTS, INC.,

    MENU FOODS, INC.,

    MENU FOODS INCOME FUND,

    PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.,

    NEW ALBERTSON’S INC.,

    ALBERTSON’S LLC,

    THE KROGER CO. OF OHIO,

    PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES STORES, INC.,

    PET SUPERMARKET, INC.,

    PET SUPPLIES PLUS/USA INC.,

    PETSMART INC.,

    TARGET CORP. AND

    WAL-MART STORES, INC
     

    • Gold Top Dog

    This won't even reach the courts. There will be a settlement to make people quiet and everyone will move on.

    As a PETCO employee I am not allow to say any of our food is "bad" or "not premium" I can only suggest a "higher-quality" food option in comparison. All though I don't feel that way; more than half the stuff we sell is JUNK (in my opinion).

    And I'm not sure if at this point it makes it a VENDOR issues because they are marketing "premium" food to Retailers who then marketing the food to consumers...

    Personally, I'm sorry but who believes everything someone tells you? Read labels and do your homework. On a daily basis think about many objects that are marketed to you as being "premimum" or "high-quality".... this is so lame.

    • Gold Top Dog

    And the law firms make boat loads of bucks and everyone who was "represented" gets a check for 3.00 or something equally meaningless.

    • Gold Top Dog

    I just thought it was interesting that they thought they had enough evidence to go this far. Trash in dog food has been chalked up to urban legend lately. 

    • Gold Top Dog

      I really hope this goes to trial so we have a chance to learn the truth. I'm probably in the minority, but although I don't doubt many of the defendants used the alleged ingredients years ago, I don't think they still do.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Love to know how Natura Pet made the list ?

    And why Diamond's parent co. did not ? Something smells fishy...

     

    Don't disagree that the Pet Food Industry is basically selling waste products of the human food chain, but the real problem with our entire food supply is lack of regulation. 

    When this great country was founded Multi-national companies did not exist. The right to pursue happiness in my mind is being able to trust our food supply. If our companies are failing to do that on their own then they need the government to intervene.

    This law suit will be dismissed. Unless they have inside information and video it will go no where. The law firm who filed it may get a pay day but you and I the consumer will see only  a coupon for free food.

    • Gold Top Dog

    Spoke with the GM last night about this (and a couple other managers) they all just laughed.

    Because first off... it's a vendor issue (like I thought) and it will never reach the courts. Mom & Pop shops are in more trouble then PETCO or PETSMART (larger corps) because PETCO (for instance) never claimed to be this "holistic/organic/healthy" store. PETCO is a "starter store"... it was hard enough to convince people to give us Solid Gold, Natural Balance, and Blue Buffalo... and those aren't even THE BEST.

    THE TRUTH? The truth is NOTHING is this world is what they say it is. Check labels and do research. This will never never reach the courts.

    • Gold Top Dog

    I wouldn't be so quick to say that it won't reach the courts.  If people can sue McDonalds for making them fat (if anyone remembers that), I think this may be possible.  

    • Gold Top Dog

    fish n dog
    Love to know how Natura Pet made the list ?

      Feather fragments were found in a sample of  EVO Baked Treats for Dogs, and in a sample of EVO Small Bites; 

    http://www.mflegal.com/files/Exhibits%201-29%20to%203rd%20Amended%20Complaint%20[DE333-2].pdf;

     "EXTRANEOUS MATTER Under microscopic examination, feather fragments were found in the product, as per complaint.

    The manufacturer's website states that this product's poultry ingredients are "exclusive of hair and feathers except in such amounts as might occur unavoidably in good processing practices."   

     Exhibits 30-35 listed several brands of dog food in which penobarbital were found. This was followed by a report from the FDA on the risk from penobarbital in pet food;

    During the 1990s, FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) received reports from veterinarians that pentobarbital, an
    anesthetizing agent used for dogs and other animals, seemed to be losing its effectiveness in dogs. Based on these
    reports, CVM officials decided to investigate a plausible theory that the dogs were exposed to pentobarbital through dog
    food, and that this exposure was making them less responsive to pentobarbital when it was used as a drug.

     How pentobarbital can get into dog food
    Because in addition to producing anesthesia, pentobarbital is routinely used to euthanize animals, the most likely way it
    could get into dog food would be in rendered animal products.
    Rendered products come from a process that converts animal tissues to feed ingredients. Pentobarbital seems to be able to
    survive the rendering process. If animals are euthanized with pentobarbital and subsequently rendered, pentobarbital could
    be present in the rendered feed ingredients.
    In order to determine if pentobarbital residues were present in animal feeds, CVM developed a sophisticated process to
    detect and quantify minute levels – down to 2 parts per billion of pentobarbital in dry dog food. To confirm that the methods
    they developed worked properly, CVM scientists used the methods to analyze dry commercial dog foods purchased from
    retail outlets near to their Laurel, MD, laboratories. The scientists purchased dog food as part of two surveys, one in 1998
    and the second in 2000. They found some samples contained pentobarbital (see the attached tables).

    Dogs, cats not in dog food
    Because pentobarbital is used to euthanize dogs and cats at animal shelters, finding pentobarbital in rendered feed
    ingredients could suggest that the pets were rendered and used in pet food.
    CVM scientists, as part of their investigation, developed a test to detect dog and cat DNA in the protein of the dog food. All
    samples from the most recent dog food survey (2000) that tested positive for pentobarbital, as well as a subset of samples
    that tested negative, were examined for the presence of remains derived from dogs or cats. The results demonstrated a
    complete absence of material that would have been derived from euthanized dogs or cats. The sensitivity of this method is
    0.005% on a weight/weight basis; that is, the method can detect a minimum of 5 pounds of rendered remains in 50 tons of
    finished feed. Presently, it is assumed that the pentobarbital residues are entering pet foods from euthanized, rendered
    cattle or even horses. 

    FDA/CVM Report on the Risk from Pentobarbital in Dog Food ;

    Adverse health effects unlikely

    For the purposes of CVM’s assessment the scientists assumed that at most, dogs would be exposed to no more than 4micrograms/kilogram body weight/day based on the highest level of pentobarbital found in the survey of dog foods. Inr eality, dogs are not likely to consume that much. The high number was based on the assumption that the smallest dogs would eat dog food containing the greatest amount of pentobarbital detected in the survey of commercial pet foods-- 32 parts per billion. However, to get to the exposure level of 50 micrograms of pentobarbital per day, which is the highest level at which no biological response was seen, a dog would have to consume between 5 to 10 micrograms of pentobarbital per kilogram of body weight. But the most any dog would consume, based on the survey results, was 4 micrograms pentobarbital per kilogram of body weight per day.

    It should be emphasized that induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes is a normal response to many substances that are
    naturally found in foods. It is not an indication of harm, but was selected as the most sensitive indicator to detect any
    biological effect due to pentobarbital.
    Thus, the results of the assessment led CVM to conclude that it is highly unlikely a dog consuming dry dog food will
    experience any adverse effects from exposures to the low levels of pentobarbital found in CVM’s dog food surveys.