brookcove
Posted : 1/31/2008 12:19:30 PM
Wild animals are usually also under nourished. That's one reason I actually don't go for the whole, wolf model, for feeding my dogs. I don't want my dogs to look like the mangy, malnourished coyotes I see running around here - who have so few reserves that they are suseptible to every bug that they catch, or drop from parasitism at what would be middle age for my dogs.
Ben is raw fed - whole bones, organs, and extra muscle meat make up probably 97% of his diet. It doesn't get much closer to nature than that - I do believe it's more meat based than Charlie's favorite food, no matter how you cut it. If Ben ate as much as he wanted right now, he'd be fat, trust me, because over the holidays I got busy, didn't take him for his weigh-in, and noticed, OOPS, I had let him get a bit chubby! Wait, let me savor the moment because that may be the first time I've said that about Ben . . . 
Yes, it's easier to overfeed a dog when carbs make up the bulk of the energy fed, but that's because carbs are very dense, burn quickly, and leave the dog begging for more in mere hours. But dogs love to eat - it makes them happy just like eating makes us happy. There's no real evidence that I've ever seen for a consistent "self-regulating" mechanism. Some dogs will even eat until their stomachs are so full they throw up, and then they will eat again. And then you'll see some dogs that really don't care that much about food.
I've got both kinds in my pack here, and sometimes (like with Ben) age or circumstances will change the way a dog feels about food, too - a complete turnaround. I can remember when Cord got here, I'd have to resist the urge to beg him to eat. Then I figured out his needs and now he's the biggest chow hound here.