24Pawsnclaws
Posted : 11/2/2007 11:10:21 AM
My take on things is that I only want to use foods that can actually make the claim that their meat sources are "human-grade", USDA inspected, grass fed, free-range, wild-caught etc. AND back it up. I know for a fact that any meats that come out of New Zealand and Australia are NOT 3D, 4D or anything else because those countries and the EU specifically BAN the use of any such meats in pet foods , unlike these idiots here in the US ( FDA, USDA ) who could care less what kind of ingredients go into those bags and cans. If you're reading the label or watching /reading the advertising for a food and read info on the company and know it's background any manufacturer who DOES use quality meats is definitely going to mention it and put some kind of "certification assurance" behind it. Companies like Purina, P&G, Mars, Hills, Iams etc are NEVER going to make any of these claims because they CAN'T. They can give you lip service and "tell" you that they do all they want when you inquire, because face it... they're NOT going to tell you that they ARE using 4D, 3D or whatever meats because they'd be cutting their own throats. OF COURSE they are going to skirt the issue and "pretend" to use quality meat sources but I defy any of them to actually PROVE with documentation that they DO. Well again... they CAN'T . I can guarantee you that never in our lifetime without heavy Government regulation and intervention, will you EVER EVER EVER see Iams, Purina, Hills or any of these food industry giants use the terms "free range", grass fed, antibiotic and hormone free, non-GMO, human grade , USDA inspected or "from meats fit for human consumption" or any other term that relates to whole, quality , healthy foods, on their packaging or in their advertising. They will keep up the slick advertising campaigns and let the consumer ASSUME that they are filling their foods with "healthy veggies and fruits and prime cuts of meat". Maybe that's the reason that there is currently a humonguous class action lawsuit against all of the major manufacturers for " grossly deceptive advertising". http://www.northcountrygazette.org/news/2007/05/15/pet_lawsuit/
I say stick to foods and manufacturers that you KNOW can back up/certify where their ingredients come from and the quality of their sources and then you won't have to "guess" at what you're actually feeding. If a company cannot assure you that they are using USDA inspected , disease-free meats that have NOT been rejected by the USDA as not being fit for human consumption... I'd avoid them.... period. I'd also prefer meat sources from New Zealand and Australia over any unverified US source simple because of the rigorous restrictions those countries impose on the meat industry there. ( Brazil is another country with EXTREMELY strict standards when it comes to raising animals for meat for example their cattle/beef are required to be free-range grass fed ;).
I love the ingredients for this food but only insofar as I can "assume" they are USDA inspected ingredients. This company makes no claim, however that ANY of their ingredients are from quality, safe, inspected sources . Sure.. they use bison and venison but from WHERE and HOW is it raised ?? Is their fish ethoxyquin-free ?? Is it farm raised or wild caught ? If it's farm-raised it's antibiotic and pesticide laden. Bison and venison can very well be raised in a "factory farm" setting. I don't see them making any claims that it's grass fed or free-range or from anywhere outside the US where it would have to be. This food could very well be a Science Diet / Nutro / Iams quality product with more clever marketing by using "exotic" meat sources and throw ins making it SOUND like a Timberwolf/Orijen/Nature's Variety/Innova quality product. We just don't know though, do we ???