spiritdogs
Posted : 5/12/2006 6:56:45 AM
The only things I have been able to find out about him are:
1. He says he's been a trainer for over 20 years.
That would make me want to ask what methods he employs. Not all of us who have been training that long have switched to positive dog-friendly methods. Some folks still use a lot of correction-based training. If you want positive training, be sure to ask.
2. He opposes breed bans.
That's good. So do I. But, he is not very articulate in the few articles I was able to find, saying merely that he has trained a lot of Pit Bulls, and they have all turned out to be great dogs.
I have trained a lot of Pits, too, and they don't always turn out great, any more than any other breed. So, who's kidding whom?
3. In the area Joe Rosen teaches in, there are many so-called trainers who aren't worth diddly, or who are actually training dogs to be aggressive.
Find out if he's one of them or not.
Protection dogs are not made out of pets turned nasty - these dogs need an extremely stable temperament so that they have a reliable "shut off switch", and not all dogs who are presented for training should be trained that way.
Many trainers are trained at facilities. Many are self taught, or apprentice. I am less concerned with where someone was instructed - I would want to know how they train *now*.
The Canadian Association of Pet Dog Trainers site should have a list of trainers who train positively. You could also check some of the clicker training sites.
You can ask to audit a class. If you see leash pops, choke chains, etc., it isn't positive motivational training, it's based on the avoidance of pain. Both methods work, but my preference is for methods that are easiest on the dog. What would you rather have - a boss who gives you a bonus when you do well, or one who picks on your mistakes by yelling at you?