ron2
Posted : 7/6/2006 9:20:09 PM
No doubt, others will think of some ingredient such as grains and grain fragments as being nothing more than filler and devoid of nutritional benefit. Actually, such ingredients as grains do have several important nutrients and this info can be found at websites having nothing to do with pet nutrition. In fact, I found some info at a website that detailed a new piece of equipment that analyses grain by means of infrared.
Let's pretend for a moment, that a grain fragment had absolutely no nutritional value, could not be absorbed in the GIT, was nothing more than filler and did nothing more than act as a binder to hold meat and a few veggie fragments together. That means it would pass on through the GIT and the food would present a higher animal protein profile to the GIT, n'est pas? If it was devoid of value and th GIT couldn't handle it, it would pass right on through. To the body, it would seem to be mainly meat, plus other stuff it passes. Does that sound logical?
OTOH, since the body can absorb some stuff from some fragments, then they are viable sources of nutrients, in addition to meat products. Nicht wahr?