brookcove
Posted : 6/7/2006 10:06:41 PM
Sasha0999 I hope you don't mind my moving that statement of yours to a new thread! That should make some interesting discussion! [
]
On this, I've had numerous direct and indirect experiences with dogs that were experiencing serious health problems on even the best premium food available, make turnarounds that MAY have added years to their lives. I have a friend, also, with working BCs, who had littermates who were 12 and looking pretty old (average lifespan on a BC maybe 13-15). She switched them to raw (prey model) and a few months later you wouldn't think they were the same dogs. They went back to working, and one lived to be 16 and the other is still around, I believe, though too deaf to work now. These dogs had littermates who all died before they were 14.
I have another friend, also very hard working BCs. For 25 years, she's fed her dogs nothing but "bull nuts", cull chickens, and a little cheap dog food when the chickens are scarce. She laughs that she was the first raw feeder and sure did have a giggle when our other friend mentioned above, decided to give it a try (she's a research biologist and seeing was NOT believing for her - research was believing). Anyway, her dogs all live into their late teens - she had to put her darling Harvey down at the "young" age of 17 and now fears the chicken companies are screwing around with her chickens so that they are harming her dogs. Because Harvey was "only" 17!
The BC breed itself was developed to thrive on "farm trash" so you have to consider that. In the old days, they were considered to be in their prime between 8 and 11 - this is well recorded through trial records and the memoirs of trainers and breeders. The farm diet was not exactly raw feeding but there was a large raw component to it similiar to my chicken farming friend - culls and scraps, plus plenty of fish, both scraps and "shares". Milk, cheese, oatmeal, and barley meal all completed the typical diet. There are many historical references remarking on the amazing good health of this "poor man's dog". The beauty of the working sheepdog is what caught Queen Victoria's eye and her subsequent sponsoring of certain specimens of the breed as a show dog is what gave us the rough collie.
I've switched numerous rescues over to raw and I've never had a time that I said, "Oh shoot, I shouldn't have done that." Quite the opposite, actually. That's short term and doesn't really apply here, but it's hard to imagine that the short term improvements I see don't translate to
some advantage over the life of the dog.
I'm rambling but there's no science to bring to the table here, so rambling you will get. There never will be any science to address this question, either, because you could never truly seperate the diet from the other factors a dog brings to the longevity table - genetics, condition, living environment, even lifetime activities (an active dog versus a couch potato).
Thanks for letting me ramble, though!